Skip to content

Make ContainerInstance a standalone SDK#1480

Merged
olydis merged 5 commits intoAzure:currentfrom
yolocs:move_container_instance
Jul 27, 2017
Merged

Make ContainerInstance a standalone SDK#1480
olydis merged 5 commits intoAzure:currentfrom
yolocs:move_container_instance

Conversation

@yolocs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yolocs yolocs commented Jul 27, 2017

This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@msftclas
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yolo3301,
Thanks for your contribution as a Microsoft full-time employee or intern. You do not need to sign a CLA.
Thanks,
Microsoft Pull Request Bot

# override the default output folder
output-folder: $(output-folder)/python
license-header: MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION
payload-flattening-threshold: 2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add namespace: azure.mgmt.containerinstance

I will override for now in my conf, but would be nice directly here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added. Thanks!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lmazuel lmazuel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incorrect tag

```


### Tag: package-container-instance-2017-08-preview
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blocking: this tag is incorrect and should be package-2017-08-preview in the three places used

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Corrected.

@lmazuel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lmazuel commented Jul 27, 2017

Title is incorrect:
"title": "Microsoft Container Instance Management Client"
should not contain Microsoft. This field is used to generate the client name, it's not just documentation.

I will override it for now in Python. @olydis for guidance.

@lmazuel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lmazuel commented Jul 27, 2017

I approved the tag fix, because it allows me to use the MD, but title is still to be fixed.

@yolocs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

yolocs commented Jul 27, 2017

@lmazuel Title updated

@lmazuel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lmazuel commented Jul 27, 2017

Python PR: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#1330
I'm starting the Python review to see if there is more to change at the Swagger level

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/compute/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 116 Error(s): 33
After the PR: Warning(s): 116 Error(s): 33

File: specification/containerinstance/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0
After the PR: Warning(s): 7 Error(s): 2

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues

Send feedback and make AutoRest Linter Azure Bot smarter day by day!

Thanks for your co-operation.

@lmazuel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lmazuel commented Jul 27, 2017

Need guidance to confirm list best practices ( @olydis @fearthecowboy @sergey-shandar @veronicagg @amarzavery please :)), but in my understanding:

  • List by subscription should be called "list" (not "list_all" as currently)
  • List by RG should be called "list_by_resource_group" (not "list" as currently)

@olydis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

olydis commented Jul 27, 2017

@lmazuel Absolutely correct, thanks for catching that. Furthermore:

@yolocs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

yolocs commented Jul 27, 2017

@olydis Update is going to be supported in the near future in this API.

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi There,

I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result:

File: specification/compute/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 116 Error(s): 33
After the PR: Warning(s): 116 Error(s): 33

File: specification/containerinstance/resource-manager/readme.md
Before the PR: Warning(s): 0 Error(s): 0
After the PR: Warning(s): 6 Error(s): 2

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues

Send feedback and make AutoRest Linter Azure Bot smarter day by day!

Thanks for your co-operation.

```

### Tag: package-container-instance-2017-08-preview

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for removing 👍

@olydis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

olydis commented Jul 27, 2017

synced with @dsgouda, awaiting his signoff

@yolocs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

yolocs commented Jul 27, 2017

@olydis @lmazuel @dsgouda Thanks guys!

@dsgouda
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dsgouda commented Jul 27, 2017

Signing off, thanks @olydis , @lmazuel

@olydis olydis merged commit 777755f into Azure:current Jul 27, 2017
@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No modification for AutorestCI/azure-sdk-for-python

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No modification for AutorestCI/azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No modification for AutorestCI/azure-sdk-for-node

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants