-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Adding swagger spec for RecoveryServices.SiteRecovery service. #1209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2cff60c
Adding swagger spec for RecoveryServices.SiteRecovery service (2016-0…
avneeshraiusit 46786da
Adding missing example support for 7 APIs.
avneeshraiusit f9e7be7
1) Renaming GetTrackAsyncOperation to GetOperationResults in operatio…
avneeshraiusit 480f5ab
Renaming examples to match renamed operation ids.
avneeshraiusit 66b1c50
Taking PR comments:
avneeshraiusit bf46d38
1) Taking review comment: Removing all operationresults operations an…
avneeshraiusit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
39 changes: 0 additions & 39 deletions
39
...overyservicessiterecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationFabrics_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
39 changes: 0 additions & 39 deletions
39
...recoveryservicessiterecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationJobs_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
29 changes: 0 additions & 29 deletions
29
...veryservicessiterecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationPolicies_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
60 changes: 0 additions & 60 deletions
60
...rvicessiterecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationProtectedItems_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
37 changes: 0 additions & 37 deletions
37
...overy/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationProtectionContainerMappings_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
32 changes: 0 additions & 32 deletions
32
...siterecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationProtectionContainers_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
75 changes: 0 additions & 75 deletions
75
...ervicessiterecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationRecoveryPlans_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
38 changes: 0 additions & 38 deletions
38
...ecovery/2016-08-10/examples/ReplicationRecoveryServicesProviders_GetOperationResults.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is really a boolean value, should this property be represented as boolean on the swagger? then you can use boolean true/false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@veronicagg Service is expecting this as string. Its an intentional change. We realized this while trying to validate a variance of testfailover.