Bump up version number for "old" preview api#10768
Merged
erich-wang merged 28 commits intoAzure:masterfrom Sep 16, 2020
Merged
Conversation
Fixed systemData.
Fixed identitytype case.
…nt PR to rename properties.
Removed optional properties from dataControllers. Marked some properties required for dataControllers.
[Staging] Swagger Validation Report
️✔️ |
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
R3023 - OperationsAPIImplementation |
Operations API must be implemented for '/providers/Microsoft.AzureData/operations'. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L18 |
| Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L1536 |
|
| The response of operation:'DataControllers_ListInSubscription' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L884 |
|
| The response of operation:'SqlManagedInstances_List' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L20 |
|
| The response of operation:'SqlManagedInstances_ListByResourceGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L59 |
|
| The response of operation:'DataControllers_ListInGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L923 |
|
| The response of operation:'SqlServerInstances_ListByResourceGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L347 |
|
| The response of operation:'PostgresInstances_List' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L596 |
|
| The response of operation:'PostgresInstances_ListByResourceGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L635 |
|
| The response of operation:'SqlServerInstances_List' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L308 |
️️✔️Avocado [Detail]
️✔️Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation [Detail]
️✔️Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation [Detail]
️✔️Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
Trenton Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @erich-wang can you help us review this PR? There is a validation failing regarding support for the "operations api". It's our understanding that we don't have to support that for preview, only for GA (which we plan on doing). Thank you for your help. |
Member
|
@jorgbaca , as mentioned in the description: |
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you for your help @erich-wang . I'll reach out to the on call. |
Contributor
Author
|
@erich-wang Contacted ARM and they already signed off. Let me know if you need anything from me to complete this PR. Thanks you. |
erich-wang
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2020
nitegupt
pushed a commit
to nitegupt/azure-rest-api-specs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2020
* WIP: Updating Microsoft.AzureData * Minor changes * Adding new SystemData property to examples * Fixed formatting * Update azuredata.json Fixed systemData. * Update azuredata.json Fixed identitytype case. * Fixed formatting * Removing changes from this PR (suggested by ARM). Will send a different PR to rename properties. * Added optional properties to sqlManagedInstances. Removed optional properties from dataControllers. Marked some properties required for dataControllers. * Ran prettier check * Adding missing parameter * Added new definition for data controller patch model * Fixed parameter * Copying 2019 api to 2020 * Removing EOS examples (and list operation which is not supported) * Remvoing EOS stuff from azuredata.json. Removing operation resource as well * Update postgres details * Update postgres example * Updating api-version in examples * Adding last uploaded date and k8sRaw * Update descriptions * Fix paramters * Add missing bracket * Update readme
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.