Skip to content

Adding methods for devices and device-templates#164

Merged
digimaun merged 13 commits into
devfrom
unknown repository
Apr 21, 2020
Merged

Adding methods for devices and device-templates#164
digimaun merged 13 commits into
devfrom
unknown repository

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ghost ghost commented Apr 16, 2020

Add capability to add/remove/list/get devices and device templates


This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. For more information see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencode@microsoft.com with any additional questions or comments.

Thank you for contributing to the IoT extension!

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

General Guidelines

  • If introducing new functionality or modified behavior, are they backed by unit and integration tests?
  • In the same context as above are command names and their parameter definitions accurate? Do help docs have sufficient content?
  • Have all unit and integration tests passed locally? i.e. pytest <project root> -vv
  • Have static checks passed using the .pylintrc and .flake8 rules? Look at the CI scripts for example usage.

@ghost ghost requested a review from digimaun as a code owner April 16, 2020 04:49
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ghost commented Apr 17, 2020

image

@ghost ghost changed the title [DRAFT] Adding methods for devices and device-templates Adding methods for devices and device-templates Apr 17, 2020
Comment thread azext_iot/central/commands_device.py Outdated
Comment thread azext_iot/central/commands_device_template.py Outdated
Comment thread azext_iot/central/commands_device_template.py Outdated
Comment thread azext_iot/central/services/_utility.py
Comment thread pytest.ini.example
Comment thread azext_iot/central/_help.py
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ghost commented Apr 21, 2020

image

@digimaun digimaun merged commit b563743 into Azure:dev Apr 21, 2020
@ghost ghost deleted the prbans/device-methods branch May 4, 2020 19:43
c-ryan-k pushed a commit to c-ryan-k/azure-iot-cli-extension that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
…selector (Azure#164)

* For reasons AKS-EE has issues with direct-lookup of the target mixed case cluster role binding via proxy. This issue does not repro against arc-connected k3s via proxy. Refactoring to field selector allows consistent results including against AKS-EE.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant