Skip to content

fix(ui-angular): bump vite to 7.3.2 (GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r)#241

Merged
manekinekko merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-vite-server-fs-deny-vulnerability-again
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

fix(ui-angular): bump vite to 7.3.2 (GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r)#241
manekinekko merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/fix-vite-server-fs-deny-vulnerability-again

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Apr 29, 2026

CVE-2026-39364: server.fs.deny rules in Vite <7.3.2 can be bypassed by appending query params (?raw, ?import&raw, ?import&url&inline), leaking denied files with HTTP 200. The dev Dockerfile runs ng serve --host 0.0.0.0, satisfying the network-exposure prerequisite.

Changes

  • packages/ui-angular/package.json — adds overrides.vite: "^7.3.2" to force the transitive pin (vite is pulled in by @angular/build, not a direct dep)
"overrides": {
  "vite": "^7.3.2"
}
  • packages/ui-angular/package-lock.json — regenerated; node_modules/vite now resolves to 7.3.2

Reachability

Condition Status
Dev server exposed to network Dockerfile uses --host 0.0.0.0
Explicit server.fs.deny config ❌ Not configured (Vite defaults only)
Production served by Vite Dockerfile.production emits a static bundle

Assessment (high confidence): Dev environment is exposed but no explicit server.fs.deny patterns are configured beyond Vite's built-in defaults (.env*, *.key, *.crt, etc.). Those defaults are still bypassable with the vulnerability. Production is unaffected. Fix is warranted to close the dev-time risk.

Original prompt

This section details the Dependabot vulnerability alert you should resolve

<alert_title>Vite: server.fs.deny bypassed with queries</alert_title>
<alert_description>### Summary

The contents of files that are specified by server.fs.deny can be returned to the browser.

Impact

Only apps that match the following conditions are affected:

Details

On the Vite dev server, files that should be blocked by server.fs.deny (e.g., .env, *.crt) can be retrieved with HTTP 200 responses when query parameters such as ?raw, ?import&raw, or ?import&url&inline are appended.

PoC

  1. Start the dev server: pnpm exec vite root --host 127.0.0.1 --port 5175 --strictPort
  2. Confirm that server.fs.deny is enforced (expect 403): curl -i http://127.0.0.1:5175/src/.env | head -n 20
    image
  3. Confirm that the same files can be retrieved with query parameters (expect 200):
    image</alert_description>

high
GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r, CVE-2026-39364
vite
npm
<vulnerable_versions>7.1.5</vulnerable_versions>
<patched_version>7.3.2</patched_version>
<manifest_path>packages/ui-angular/package-lock.json</manifest_path>

https://github.com/vitejs/vite/security/advisories/GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r https://github.com/vitejs/vite/pull/22160 https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commit/a9a3df299378d9cbc5f069e3536a369f8188c8ff https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases/tag/v7.3.2 https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases/tag/v8.0.5 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39364 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r

<task_instructions>Resolve this alert by updating the affected package to a non-vulnerable version. Prefer the lowest non-vulnerable version (see the patched_version field above) over the latest to minimize breaking changes. Include a Reachability Assessment section in the PR description. Review the alert_description field to understand which APIs, features, or configurations are affected, then search the codebase for usage of those specific items. If the vulnerable code path is reachable, explain how (which files, APIs, or call sites use the affected functionality) and note that the codebase is actively exposed to this vulnerability. If the vulnerable code path is not reachable, explain why (e.g. the affected API is never called, the vulnerable configuration is not used) and note that the update is primarily to satisfy vulnerability scanners rather than to address an active risk. If the advisory is too vague to determine reachability (e.g. 'improper input validation' with no specific API named), state that reachability could not be determined and explain why. Include a confidence level in the reachability assessment (e.g. high confidence if the advisory names a specific API and you confirmed it is or is not called, low confidence if the usage is indirect and hard to trace). If no patched version is available, check the alert_description field for a Workarounds section — the advisory may describe configuration changes or usage patterns that mitigate the vulnerability without a version update. If a workaround is available, apply it and leave a code comment referencing the advisory identifier explaining it is a temporary mitigation. If neither a patch nor a workaround is available, explain in the PR description why the alert cannot be resolved automatically so a human reviewer can take over. Inspect the repository to determine which package manager is used (e.g. lock files, config files, build scripts) and use that tooling to perform the update — do not edit lock files directly. If the version constraint in the manifest (e.g. package.json, Gemfile, pyproject.toml) caps the version below the fix, update the constraint first. For transitive dependencies, determine whether it is simpler to update the direct dependency that pulls in the vulnerable package or to update the transitive dependency directly, and choose the least disruptive approach. If upgrading to fix the vulnerability forces a major version bump or known breaking changes, review the changelog or releas...

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix Vite server fs.deny bypass vulnerability fix(ui-angular): bump vite to 7.3.2 (GHSA-v2wj-q39q-566r) Apr 29, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from manekinekko April 29, 2026 13:15
@manekinekko manekinekko marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2026 13:43
@manekinekko manekinekko merged commit 4a06c53 into main Apr 29, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants