Skip to content

feat(msgpack): ability to specify NOSCHEMA for cbinds#605

Merged
ludamad merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ad/bb-constants
Jul 12, 2023
Merged

feat(msgpack): ability to specify NOSCHEMA for cbinds#605
ludamad merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ad/bb-constants

Conversation

@ludamad
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ludamad ludamad commented Jul 12, 2023

Description

This came up when generating constants from Circuits code. We want the CBIND infrastructure, but don't care about generated Typescript as the object format is very simple.

Checklist:

  • I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line.
  • Every change is related to the PR description.
  • The branch has been merged with/rebased against the head of its merge target.
  • There are no unexpected formatting changes, superfluous debug logs, or commented-out code.
  • There are no circuit changes, OR a cryptographer has been assigned for review.
  • [-] New functions, classes, etc. have been documented according to the doxygen comment format. Classes and structs must have @brief describing the intended functionality.
  • If existing code has been modified, such documentation has been added or updated.
  • No superfluous include directives have been added.
  • [-] I have linked to any issue(s) it resolves.
  • I'm happy for the PR to be merged at the reviewer's next convenience.

@ludamad ludamad requested review from benesjan and sirasistant July 12, 2023 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants