Conversation
| /* Generates a monomial basis Grumpkin SRS for testing purposes. | ||
| We only provide functionality create a single transcript file. | ||
| The SRS has the form [1]_1, [x]_1, [x^2]_1, ... where x = 2. */ | ||
| /** |
| template <UltraFlavor Flavor> | ||
| UltraProver_<Flavor> UltraHonkComposerHelper_<Flavor>::create_prover(CircuitConstructor& circuit_constructor) | ||
| { | ||
| finalize_circuit(circuit_constructor); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't see a reason for composer helpers to have a function that proxies immediately to circuit_constructor.finalize_circuit so I made the change.
| @@ -1,19 +1,18 @@ | |||
| #include "standard_honk_composer.hpp" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The tests that were refactors have enormous diffs. I tried hard to keep the work to a totally formulaic refactor.
| @@ -1,274 +0,0 @@ | |||
| #pragma once | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file is not in use anywhere.
| fr alpha_base, | ||
| fr alpha) const; | ||
|
|
||
| void update_circuit_in_the_head(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This function is declared but not defined.
| verification_key_pt::from_witness(&outer_composer, verification_key_native); | ||
|
|
||
| info("Constructing the ultra (inner) proof ..."); | ||
| plonk::proof recursive_proof = prover.construct_proof(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Name was vague. If anything, I'd call the outer proof, the one constructed by the recursive verifier, the recursive proof.
| @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ | |||
| # TODO(Cody): Remove plonk dependency | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had already observed with Mara that this was easy to do, and doing so here let me work on this PR more incrementally.
|
|
||
| auto* context = P0.get_context(); | ||
|
|
||
| context->check_circuit(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you want to leave this in? Currently it will only print information about failed gates
codygunton
changed the title
|
I don't understand why it's complaining about the conventional commit title. |
I force re-ran it and everything seems ok |
I swear the action/github actions is just a bit buggy - I see PR's close and then suddenly their bad status propagates to another PR |
Co-authored-by: Rumata888 <isennovskiy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rumata888 <isennovskiy@gmail.com>
3 participants
Description
With this PR, honk_tests and plonk_tests targets build without a composer wrapping a circuit constructor and composer helper. I verified this by temporarily deleting the composer files and rebuilding, but the composer files are still present place because other parts of Barretenberg still depend on them. Next step is to split the stdlib tests and then delete the old composers.
Along the way I deleted some unused (or declared but not defined) functions, did some renaming (some
composers becomecircuit_constructororbuilder; I leave a mix since a big renaming PR will have to be made later anyway), removed the honk dependency on plonk (very easy), and did other nice small bits of cleanup.Checklist:
/markdown/specshave been updated.@briefdescribing the intended functionality.