feat: slot duration flexibility by LHerskind · Pull Request #8122 · AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

LHerskind · 2024-08-21T21:46:44Z

This PR add support for using Aztec slot durations that are not just 1 ethereum slot.

To do so it adds more logic to the sequencer such that they can figure out if they are really the sequencer or not.
This is mainly in the canProposeBlock and shouldProposeBlock functions which respectively assert that the proposer can actually propose, and whether he should. The logic in those functions are partly what we had sprinkled over the code before, but also adding some additional checks to match what is in the rollup contract and Leonidas.

Since there are now additional restrictions to block production related to WHEN the block is to land on L1, I have added a commitTimeJump function into the l1-publisherwhich will jump to the next slot after a block have been published. This functionality toggled with a TIME_TRAVELER boolean flag.

Note that we will jump INTO the next slot, since simulations in viem and anvil are limited to run on block values in the bast, meaning that we cannot nicely just simulate as if it was included in the NEXT block which is what we ideally want. See issue #8110 for more information.

Since it caused some issues that there was no actual genesis state (just 0), I have inserted a genesis state equal to what we compute as the lastArchive for the very first block, fixing #4148.

To not mess too much with DEVNET, the extra logic related to the exact timing of when L2 blocks should make it onto L1 can be "toggled" with the IS_DEV_NET flag.

Namely, if IS_DEV_NET is toggled, we can publish outside of the "current" slot, as long as the slots are in order. With the changes in this pr, we should be able to run DEVNET without automine, I have tried a minor test but that seemed to work fine when we have AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 36 and internal mining :)

Points of interest:

sequencer.ts
- canProposeBlock
- shouldProposeBlock
l1-publisher.ts
- Adding simulate since viem write does not provide meaningful error messages, but simulate does.
- The commitTimeJump won't happen if the AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION or TIME_TRAVELER = false
sequencer.test.ts
- Some of the test naming a odd. For example the test builds a block that contains zero real transactions once flushed sounds to me like you expect to have an empty block, after the block flushed, e.g., once flushed make it sound like it already happened
l1-publisher.test.ts
- does not publish if last archive root is different to expected is deleted, as that job falls on the sequencer. The sequencer should define whether or not it will send a tx, and publisher deals more with publishing tasks.
- Adding a simulate that is also mocked to account for simulate in the publisher.
e2e_p2p_network.test.ts
- There is a flag for using a local anvil chain that you are running in another terminal. This is useful for running internal mining etc.

This PR will be run with AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 12 and IS_DEV_NET = true. Note that when using values different from those, there are still some hiccups and kinks, but it should be addressed in a separate PR to not make this explode in size.

LHerskind · 2024-08-21T21:47:02Z

feat: slot duration flexibility #8122 👈
master

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @LHerskind and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

AztecBot · 2024-08-21T23:09:02Z

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

proof_construction_time_sha256_100_ms (16): 7,409 (+36%)
proof_construction_time_sha256_100_ms (32): 7,211 (+33%)

Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Proof generation

Each column represents the number of threads used in proof generation.

Metric	1 threads	4 threads	16 threads	32 threads	64 threads
proof_construction_time_sha256_ms	5,876 (+2%)	1,586 (+2%)	743 (+5%)	800 (+5%)	785 (+1%)
proof_construction_time_sha256_30_ms	12,343 (+8%)	3,425 (+11%)	1,547 (+13%)	1,550 (+8%)	1,607 (+10%)
proof_construction_time_sha256_100_ms	45,453 (+3%)	13,241 (+12%)	⚠️ 7,409 (+36%)	⚠️ 7,211 (+33%)	6,323 (+10%)
proof_construction_time_poseidon_hash_ms	79.0 (+1%)	34.0	34.0	58.0	86.0 (-2%)
proof_construction_time_poseidon_hash_30_ms	1,540 (+1%)	424 (+1%)	203	229 (+2%)	273 (+2%)
proof_construction_time_poseidon_hash_100_ms	5,778 (+2%)	1,542 (+2%)	694 (+3%)	738 (-1%)	770 (+4%)

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric	4 txs	8 txs	16 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes	4,356	7,876	14,884
l1_rollup_calldata_gas	50,244	92,966	178,240
l1_rollup_execution_gas	842,904	1,576,522	3,361,852
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms	251 (-3%)	460 (+5%)	819 (-3%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms	11,314	22,169	44,125 (-1%)
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms	11,313	22,168	44,125 (-1%)
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms	9,582 (-1%)	20,347	42,294 (-1%)

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 8 txs.

Metric	3 blocks	5 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms	3,012 (+3%)	3,931 (+3%)
node_database_size_in_bytes	12,615,760	16,732,240
pxe_database_size_in_bytes	16,254	26,813

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every kernel circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit	simulation_time_in_ms	witness_generation_time_in_ms	input_size_in_bytes	output_size_in_bytes	proving_time_in_ms
private-kernel-init	90.8 (-1%)	396 (-1%)	21,735	44,860	N/A
private-kernel-inner	177 (+1%)	706 (-1%)	72,544	45,007	N/A
private-kernel-reset-tiny	312	717	65,593	44,846	N/A
private-kernel-tail	167 (+1%)	139	50,644	52,257	N/A
base-parity	5.59	N/A	160	96.0	N/A
root-parity	35.3	N/A	73,948	96.0	N/A
base-rollup	3,429	N/A	189,136	664	N/A
block-root-rollup	41.4	N/A	58,205	2,448	N/A
public-kernel-setup	85.2	N/A	105,085	71,222	N/A
public-kernel-app-logic	96.7	N/A	104,911	71,222	N/A
public-kernel-tail	859	N/A	390,582	16,414	N/A
private-kernel-reset-small	314 (+1%)	N/A	66,341	45,629	N/A
private-kernel-tail-to-public	671	614	455,400	1,825	N/A
public-kernel-teardown	84.5 (+1%)	N/A	105,349	71,222	N/A
merge-rollup	20.3	N/A	38,174	664	N/A
undefined	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	77,332 (-1%)

Stats on running time collected for app circuits

Function	input_size_in_bytes	output_size_in_bytes	witness_generation_time_in_ms
ContractClassRegisterer:register	1,344	11,731	343 (+1%)
ContractInstanceDeployer:deploy	1,408	11,731	18.4
MultiCallEntrypoint:entrypoint	1,920	11,731	406 (+1%)
FeeJuice:deploy	1,376	11,731	394 (+1%)
SchnorrAccount:constructor	1,312	11,731	73.6 (+1%)
SchnorrAccount:entrypoint	2,304	11,731	396
Token:privately_mint_private_note	1,280	11,731	104
FPC:fee_entrypoint_public	1,344	11,731	27.9 (+7%)
Token:transfer	1,312	11,731	235 (+3%)
Benchmarking:create_note	1,344	11,731	85.2 (-2%)
SchnorrAccount:verify_private_authwit	1,280	11,731	27.7 (+1%)
Token:unshield	1,376	11,731	527 (+1%)
FPC:fee_entrypoint_private	1,376	11,731	703 (-4%)

AVM Simulation

Time to simulate various public functions in the AVM.

Function	time_ms	bytecode_size_in_bytes
FeeJuice:_increase_public_balance	57.1 (+4%)	7,101
FeeJuice:set_portal	11.1 (+15%)	2,128
Token:constructor	81.4 (+3%)	25,285
FPC:constructor	53.2 (+1%)	17,853
FeeJuice:mint_public	39.9 (+2%)	5,415
Token:mint_public	44.7 (+1%)	10,101
Token:assert_minter_and_mint	67.8 (+4%)	6,844
AuthRegistry:set_authorized	48.0	3,969
FPC:prepare_fee	257 (+9%)	6,747
Token:transfer_public	27.6 (+1%)	38,126
FPC:pay_refund	51.0 (-4%)	9,398
Benchmarking:increment_balance	1,194	6,179
Token:_increase_public_balance	41.5 (+2%)	7,705
FPC:pay_refund_with_shielded_rebate	63.1 (+4%)	9,881

Public DB Access

Time to access various public DBs.

Function	time_ms
get-nullifier-index	0.160 (+3%)

Tree insertion stats

The duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.

Metric	1 leaves	16 leaves	64 leaves	128 leaves	256 leaves	512 leaves	1024 leaves
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_ms	2.20 (+1%)	3.86	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_count	16.8	31.7	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_ms	0.115 (+2%)	0.109	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	11.3 (+1%)	17.7 (-1%)	30.6 (+1%)	59.9 (+1%)	113 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	95.9	159	287	543	1,055
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	0.108 (+1%)	0.103 (-1%)	0.0995 (+1%)	0.103 (+1%)	0.101 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	14.2	25.9 (+2%)	43.6 (+1%)	86.5 (+6%)	165 (+2%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	109	207	355	691	1,363
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	0.107 (-1%)	0.104 (+2%)	0.106 (+1%)	0.106 (+5%)	0.104 (+1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	16.7	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	132	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	0.107 (+1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contract classes are registered in the tx.

Metric	0 registered classes	1 registered classes
tx_size_in_bytes	64,779	668,997

Transaction size based on fee payment method

| Metric | |
| - | |

LHerskind · 2024-08-22T10:17:56Z

@spalladino I recall you mentioned at some point to let you know if new flags etc 👀 I have a new flag here, it is effective if we are using AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION != ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION but thought you might wanna know anyway.

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T14:26:42Z

noir-projects/noir-protocol-circuits/crates/types/src/constants.nr

 global INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM: Field = 1;
 global BLOB_SIZE_IN_BYTES: Field = 31 * 4096;
 global ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION: u32 = 12;
+global AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION: u32 = ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION * 1;


What is the need for the * 1?

Want the AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION to be a multiple of a ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION so just makes it very easy to change it to 3 to have the different duration 🤷 Is not really needed when the value is 1, but just kinda nice to showcase multiple I think.

Maddiaa0

Overall great work, I'm not the biggest fan of the wrap logic living within the node itself, but it seems to be a necessary evil

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T14:28:20Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

    // Genesis block
-    blocks[0] = BlockLog({archive: bytes32(0), slotNumber: 0, isProven: true});
+    blocks[0] = BlockLog({
+      archive: bytes32(0x1200a06aae1368abe36530b585bd7a4d2ba4de5037b82076412691a187d7621e),


Where is this calcualted from ?

Is the lastArchive that all tests will spit out for block 1, e.g., what initial state of the trees.

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T14:41:32Z

yarn-project/end-to-end/src/composed/integration_l1_publisher.test.ts

 const numberOfConsecutiveBlocks = 2;

+// The initial archive is what we have in the genesis block in `Rollup.sol`.
+const INITIAL_ARCHIVE = Fr.fromString('0x1200a06aae1368abe36530b585bd7a4d2ba4de5037b82076412691a187d7621e').toBuffer();


would this make sense to go in the constants if it will be hardcoded as such

Ye probably a fine idea.

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T14:42:14Z

yarn-project/end-to-end/src/composed/integration_l1_publisher.test.ts

        publisherPrivateKey: sequencerPK,
        l1PublishRetryIntervalMS: 100,
        l1ChainId: 31337,
+        timeTraveler: true,


shall we add an issue to remove this at some point

Created #8153.

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T14:48:07Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.ts

    return false;
  }

+  async commitTimeJump(slot: bigint) {


Is it enough just to have test utilities to calaulcate / do this, rather than embed this inside the publisher itself?

i guess it needs to go in here to make the other tests pass within IS_DEV_NET

The reason it was in the publisher itself was that it was something we needed to do when a block was published (or for the simulation issue), so keeping it there gave better control.

Alternatively could be running in the background in the tests to progress blocks if nothing have happened for 12 seconds essentially making a fallback to the interval mining, which would be slower unless it also look into jumping the required time for slots etc.

Tried it out. Works fine for handling the "slot already filled", but non-obvious how to check for the simulation failure without rebuilding a lot of the sequencer, so just had a "progress block at least every 12 seconds". It will kinda work, but it is really slow if it start running into the "have to wait" case.

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T14:57:51Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.test.ts

    expect(rollupContractWrite.process).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
  });

+  it('does not retry if simulating a publish and process tx fails', async () => {


Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T15:00:44Z

yarn-project/ethereum/src/deploy_l1_contracts.ts

+    client: walletClient,
+  });
+
+  // @note  We make a time jump PAST the very first slot to not have to deal with the edge case of the first slot


can you explain why the first slot is such an edge case, not necessarily in the code, but to me

The genesis block is at slot 0, so the slot is already occupied.

That feels like a worthy comment in the code

update: necessarily in the code

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T15:13:12Z

yarn-project/end-to-end/src/e2e_p2p_network.test.ts

  beforeEach(async () => {
-    ({ teardown, config, logger, deployL1ContractsValues } = await setup(0));
+    // If we want to test with interval mining, we can use the local host and start `anvil --block-time 12`
+    const useLocalHost = false;


could have the interval mining settings added to the createAnvilOpts instead? So it is not as siloed to this test

Was not always for interval, sometimes also just used it to get proper errors back. For cases like the e2e_token_contract I think it might cause quite a bit of pain if they are all using the same local anvil for example (unless interval mining ye). The case is only really interesting for testing the sequencing which is currently only happening in this test.

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T15:28:30Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/sequencer/sequencer.ts

-  @trackSpan('Sequencer.buildBlockAndPublish', (_validTxs, newGlobalVariables, _historicalHeader) => ({
-    [Attributes.BLOCK_NUMBER]: newGlobalVariables.blockNumber.toNumber(),
-  }))
+  async canProposeBlock(


Nice function

Maddiaa0 · 2024-08-22T15:31:08Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/sequencer/sequencer.ts

+    return true;
+  }
+
+  async assertCanStillProposeBlock(): Promise<void> {}


just-mitch · 2024-08-22T17:44:42Z

l1-contracts/test/sparta/Sparta.t.sol

    }

-    _testBlock("mixed_block_1", false, 0, false); // We run a block before the epoch with validators
+    _testBlock("mixed_block_1", false, 3, false); // We run a block before the epoch with validators


Dead comment

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T17:51:15Z

yarn-project/end-to-end/src/composed/integration_l1_publisher.test.ts


      // @todo @LHerskind need to make sure that time have progressed to the next slot!
-      await setTimeToNextSlot();
+      await progressTimeBySlot();


Is this just to help the next test?

Its running a loop and publishing to the contract so if the contract it unhappy it would make the test fail. The underlying chain just have to be progressed, when the block time are equal for the two there are no issues, but it gets weird when they differ without this one.

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T17:58:01Z

yarn-project/ethereum/src/deploy_l1_contracts.ts

+    client: walletClient,
+  });
+
+  // @note  We make a time jump PAST the very first slot to not have to deal with the edge case of the first slot


That feels like a worthy comment in the code

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T18:37:37Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.ts

-    const submitter = await this.getProposerAtNextEthBlock();
-    const sender = await this.getSenderAddress();
-    return submitter.isZero() || submitter.equals(sender);
+  // @note Assumes that all ethereum slots have blocks


Can we create an issue to test the case where L1 has empty slots?

Not sure if anvil allow you to do this. The issue that might be encountered if this is the very last check before publishing could be that you are publishing a tx that will end up reverting. Would happen if the last slot you could include your tx in is also the one that is skipped.

Yeah I think we'd just need to kill anvil for a period of time and then restore it.

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T18:57:30Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.ts

+    }
+
+    // If the aztec slot duration is same length as the ethereum slot duration, we don't need to do anything
+    if ((ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION as number) === (AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION as number)) {


Why doesn't this help us when they are the same?
For example, suppose L1 is at t=13 seconds after genesis.
We just published the block in slot 1.
Would we not want to jump L1 to t=24?

In that case, the next block will already be at 24, you don't need to jump to it. Also, I believe you mean t=13 for the first?

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T19:17:51Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.ts

-    return submitter.isZero() || submitter.equals(sender);
+  // @note Assumes that all ethereum slots have blocks
+  // Using next Ethereum block so we do NOT need to wait for it being mined before seeing the effect
+  public async getMetadataForSlotAtNextEthBlock(): Promise<[EthAddress, bigint, bigint, Buffer]> {


I generally dislike returning tuples like this especially when there are repeated types (bigint, bigint).

For example, it took me a minute to understand you're returning the pendingBlockNumber.

Can change it to a struct.

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T19:22:07Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/sequencer/sequencer.ts

+        throw new Error(msg);
+      }
+
+      const currentBlockNumber = await this.l2BlockSource.getBlockNumber();


How could this happen if we have ensured that L1 is expecting this block number?

const msg = 'New block was emitted while building block';

If anyone else published a block.

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T19:29:35Z

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/sequencer/sequencer.ts

+
+    if (IS_DEV_NET) {
+      // Compute time elapsed since the previous block
+      const lastBlockTime = historicalHeader?.globalVariables.timestamp.toNumber() || 0;


Seems like duplication of skipMinTxsPerBlockCheck

Different variables. minSecondsBetweenBlocks != maxSecondsBetweenBlocks.

just-mitch · 2024-08-22T19:34:14Z

yarn-project/validator-client/src/validator.ts

-    let attestations: BlockAttestation[] = [];
+    this.log.info(`Waiting for ${numberOfRequiredAttestations} attestations for slot: ${slot}`);
+
+    let attestations: BlockAttestation[] = [await this.attestToProposal(proposal)];


I always attest to my own proposal?

The smart contract does not filter the proposer from the expected signatures, this could probably be removed by doing the filtering

He is a member of the committee, so he can attest 🤷 Pretty sure the same is the case for other systems as well. If you are running small committees it is also a requirement to really hit the quorum needed.

spalladino · 2024-08-22T19:53:54Z

@LHerskind thanks for the heads up. Not sure I followed though: the new flag is the TIME_TRAVELER one, or the AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION? What should we set for devnet/provernet, or if IS_DEVNET == 1 then we can skip them?

LHerskind · 2024-08-22T20:23:01Z

@LHerskind thanks for the heads up. Not sure I followed though: the new flag is the TIME_TRAVELER one, or the AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION? What should we set for devnet/provernet, or if IS_DEVNET == 1 then we can skip them?

In here it is TIME_TRAVELER as flag, the other values are constants in the constants.nr.

Currently, we are taking a look to see if we can rip it out, such that you don't have to deal with it at all.

LHerskind · 2024-08-27T10:02:03Z

@LHerskind thanks for the heads up. Not sure I followed though: the new flag is the TIME_TRAVELER one, or the AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION? What should we set for devnet/provernet, or if IS_DEVNET == 1 then we can skip them?

Following #8193 I'm not really sure around the setup that you are using for the devnet/provernet, since I would expect you to be running it with the same block times as Eth but the issues encountered there seems to be mainly related to timing of the underlying not matching what was expected.

If the AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = ACTUAL_ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION_IN_DEVNET then TIME_TRAVELER = false is fine with IS_DEVNET = true.

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>aztec-package: 0.51.1</summary> ## [0.51.1](aztec-package-v0.51.0...aztec-package-v0.51.1) (2024-08-29) ### Features * Add status check to prover agent ([#8248](#8248)) ([7b3006a](7b3006a)) * Faster L1 deployment ([#8234](#8234)) ([51d6699](51d6699)) * Spartan token transfer ([#8163](#8163)) ([38f0157](38f0157)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.51.1</summary> ## [0.51.1](barretenberg.js-v0.51.0...barretenberg.js-v0.51.1) (2024-08-29) ### Miscellaneous * **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.51.1</summary> ## [0.51.1](aztec-packages-v0.51.0...aztec-packages-v0.51.1) (2024-08-29) ### Features * Add CLI command for gathering proving metrics ([#8221](#8221)) ([5929a42](5929a42)) * Add status check to prover agent ([#8248](#8248)) ([7b3006a](7b3006a)) * **avm:** 1-slot sload/sstore (nr, ts) ([#8264](#8264)) ([bdd9b06](bdd9b06)) * **avm:** Range check gadget ([#7967](#7967)) ([0dd954e](0dd954e)) * **docs:** Add partial notes doc ([#8192](#8192)) ([4299bbd](4299bbd)) * Faster L1 deployment ([#8234](#8234)) ([51d6699](51d6699)) * Initial validator set ([#8133](#8133)) ([6d31ad2](6d31ad2)) * L1-publisher cleanup ([#8148](#8148)) ([6ae2535](6ae2535)) * Proof surgery class ([#8236](#8236)) ([10d7edd](10d7edd)) * Request specific transactions through the p2p layer ([#8185](#8185)) ([54e1cc7](54e1cc7)) * Slot duration flexibility ([#8122](#8122)) ([708e4e5](708e4e5)) * Spartan token transfer ([#8163](#8163)) ([38f0157](38f0157)) ### Bug Fixes * Attempt to fix nightly test ([#8222](#8222)) ([477eec5](477eec5)) * **avm-simulator:** Await avm bytecode check ([#8268](#8268)) ([4410eb3](4410eb3)) * **bb-prover:** Create structure for AVM vk ([#8233](#8233)) ([55b6ba2](55b6ba2)) * **bb:** Mac build ([#8255](#8255)) ([ac54f5c](ac54f5c)) * **ci:** Spot-runner-action was not built ([#8274](#8274)) ([c1509c1](c1509c1)) * **ci:** Try fix brotli edge-case ([#8256](#8256)) ([e03ea0b](e03ea0b)) * Docker containers healthchecks ([#8228](#8228)) ([19edbbb](19edbbb)) * **docs:** Update entrypoint details on accounts page ([#8184](#8184)) ([8453ec7](8453ec7)) * Export brillig names in contract functions ([#8212](#8212)) ([4745741](4745741)) * Fixes for the nightly test run against Sepolia ([#8229](#8229)) ([cfc65c6](cfc65c6)) * Handle constant output for sha256 ([#8251](#8251)) ([0653ba5](0653ba5)) * Log public vm errors as warn in prover-agent ([#8247](#8247)) ([9f4ea9f](9f4ea9f)) * Remove devnet ARM builds for now ([#8202](#8202)) ([81ef715](81ef715)) * Remove fundFpc step from bootstrap ([#8245](#8245)) ([a742531](a742531)) * Ts codegen ([#8267](#8267)) ([cb58800](cb58800)) ### Miscellaneous * Add check to just release images to devnet-deploys ([#8242](#8242)) ([aa6791d](aa6791d)) * Add partial note support for value note ([#8141](#8141)) ([daa57cc](daa57cc)) * Always run `build-check` step in `publish-bb.yml` ([#8240](#8240)) ([5e9749f](5e9749f)) * **avm:** Replace range and cmp with gadgets ([#8164](#8164)) ([cc12558](cc12558)) * Basic network matrix ([#8257](#8257)) ([2a76b1a](2a76b1a)), closes [#8001](#8001) * **bb:** Use std::span in pippenger for scalars ([#8269](#8269)) ([2323cd5](2323cd5)) * Configure interval mining for anvil ([#8211](#8211)) ([eba57b4](eba57b4)) * Create external-ci-approved.yml ([#8235](#8235)) ([24b059b](24b059b)) * Disallow prune in devnet + add onlyOwners ([#8134](#8134)) ([c736f96](c736f96)) * Fix various warnings in noir code ([#8258](#8258)) ([1c6b478](1c6b478)) * Less noisy AVM failures in proving ([#8227](#8227)) ([03bcd62](03bcd62)) * Open an issue if publishing bb fails ([#8223](#8223)) ([2d7a775](2d7a775)) * Reinstate l1-contracts package ([#8250](#8250)) ([263a912](263a912)) * Remove unused generic parameters ([#8249](#8249)) ([00ed045](00ed045)) * Replace relative paths to noir-protocol-circuits ([1783c80](1783c80)) * Replace relative paths to noir-protocol-circuits ([ffe1f35](ffe1f35)) * Report prover metrics ([#8155](#8155)) ([dc7bcdf](dc7bcdf)), closes [#7675](#7675) * Rework balances map ([#8127](#8127)) ([1cac3dd](1cac3dd)), closes [#8104](#8104) * Run CI after merges to provernet ([#8244](#8244)) ([97e5e25](97e5e25)) ### Documentation * Minor fixes ([#8273](#8273)) ([2b8af9e](2b8af9e)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg: 0.51.1</summary> ## [0.51.1](barretenberg-v0.51.0...barretenberg-v0.51.1) (2024-08-29) ### Features * **avm:** 1-slot sload/sstore (nr, ts) ([#8264](#8264)) ([bdd9b06](bdd9b06)) * **avm:** Range check gadget ([#7967](#7967)) ([0dd954e](0dd954e)) * Proof surgery class ([#8236](#8236)) ([10d7edd](10d7edd)) ### Bug Fixes * **bb-prover:** Create structure for AVM vk ([#8233](#8233)) ([55b6ba2](55b6ba2)) * **bb:** Mac build ([#8255](#8255)) ([ac54f5c](ac54f5c)) * Handle constant output for sha256 ([#8251](#8251)) ([0653ba5](0653ba5)) ### Miscellaneous * **avm:** Replace range and cmp with gadgets ([#8164](#8164)) ([cc12558](cc12558)) * **bb:** Use std::span in pippenger for scalars ([#8269](#8269)) ([2323cd5](2323cd5)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch from e55098b to 2cb5eea Compare August 21, 2024 22:42

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch 3 times, most recently from b68ce98 to 8dd3961 Compare August 22, 2024 09:25

LHerskind mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2024

feat: nodes should only perform block proposals services if they know they are the leader #7961

Closed

LHerskind marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2024 10:18

LHerskind requested review from Maddiaa0 and just-mitch August 22, 2024 10:18

LHerskind mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2024

feat: decide TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE #8021

Closed

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch from 8dd3961 to eb16d6e Compare August 22, 2024 11:50

This was referenced Aug 22, 2024

feat: initial validator set #8133

Merged

refactor: disallow prune in devnet + add onlyOwners #8134

Merged

Maddiaa0 reviewed Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

LHerskind mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2024

feat: l1-publisher cleanup #8148

Merged

Maddiaa0 approved these changes Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch from eb16d6e to a4fd588 Compare August 22, 2024 19:05

just-mitch approved these changes Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch from a4fd588 to f056f6b Compare August 22, 2024 20:58

LHerskind added 2 commits August 27, 2024 09:36

feat: slot duration flexibility

db3b1cd

chore: devnet and 12s slots

add47dd

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch from f056f6b to 10d2ad6 Compare August 27, 2024 10:01

chore: address comments

6123a76

LHerskind force-pushed the lh/7850-slot-duration branch from 10d2ad6 to 6123a76 Compare August 27, 2024 12:59

LHerskind merged commit 708e4e5 into master Aug 27, 2024

LHerskind deleted the lh/7850-slot-duration branch August 27, 2024 14:06

AztecBot mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024

chore(master): Release 0.51.1 #8218

Merged

Conversation

LHerskind commented Aug 21, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

LHerskind commented Aug 21, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AztecBot commented Aug 21, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark results

Proof generation

L2 block published to L1

L2 chain processing

Circuits stats

AVM Simulation

Public DB Access

Tree insertion stats

Miscellaneous

Uh oh!

LHerskind commented Aug 22, 2024

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Maddiaa0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

LHerskind Aug 22, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

LHerskind Aug 22, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

LHerskind commented Aug 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

LHerskind commented Aug 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

AztecBot commented Aug 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

LHerskind Aug 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading

LHerskind Aug 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading