Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't arbitary string resolve to 123 and not 291?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's always resolved as hex currently, regardless of whether it's prefixed or not. Do we want to change the base behavior ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The base issue was that any string was getting truncated if it was an odd length.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm can we make it clear then that
fromStringexpects a hex string?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, added the comment as you specified in scrum, and refactored the check because the check didn't actually work for a hexstring like
12xx34xx56.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sklppy88 can this problem get revised? I am hitting this issue in a deep object, so i cant easily convert all my strings to hex format
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @olehmisar: I haven't had the green light to change the current behavior, but will your problem be alleviated if I add a param for you to specify the encoding ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See here, would this fix your problem ?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sklppy88 i am have to do something like this:
Now imagine that args contains a nested object or array. i will have to iterate over each object deeply (prob using recursion) to convert each number into a hex string manually.
Your example won't help as it will just change:
But if you fixed the original problem, i would be able to just write this code:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you please explain the reasoning behind not wanting to change it to autodetection of decimal vs hex? For me it's such an obvious decision. What am i missing?