-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 598
feat: enable honk_recursion through acir #6719
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a73759b
honk_recursion flag hack
lucasxia01 f9bcc65
if honk_recursion is set to true, lay down a honk recursion constrain…
lucasxia01 c6d9582
Merge branch 'master' into lx/enabling-honk-recursion-acir
lucasxia01 8530436
minor changes
lucasxia01 1704df3
Merge branch 'lx/enabling-honk-recursion-acir' of github.com:AztecPro…
lucasxia01 4e1c599
big hacks
lucasxia01 5ca34be
correct ts errors
lucasxia01 9c2eeb0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into lx/enabling-honk-re…
lucasxia01 e8048e4
don't run recursive proofs with honk with any existing test program f…
lucasxia01 7c80cfa
thread the flag through folding stuff and the new acir integration tests
lucasxia01 1db1fc4
no recursion for ultra_honk for now
lucasxia01 b5dfd37
Merge branch 'master' into lx/enabling-honk-recursion-acir
lucasxia01 b1942c6
typo in earthfile test
lucasxia01 a4967d5
Merge branch 'lx/enabling-honk-recursion-acir' of github.com:AztecPro…
lucasxia01 3259715
fix backend ts
lucasxia01 55c7dd8
honk_recursion should be based on the flavor
lucasxia01 3b5348b
typo fix
lucasxia01 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -29,15 +29,17 @@ barretenberg-acir-tests-bb: | |||||
| # This ensures we test independent pk construction through real/garbage witness data paths. | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_then_verify ./run_acir_tests.sh | ||||||
| # Construct and separately verify a UltraHonk proof for a single program | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_then_verify_ultra_honk ./run_acir_tests.sh double_verify_nested_proof | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_then_verify_ultra_honk ./run_acir_tests.sh sha256 | ||||||
| # Construct and separately verify a MegaHonk proof for all acir programs | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_then_verify_mega_honk ./run_acir_tests.sh | ||||||
| # Construct and verify a UltraHonk proof for a single program | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_and_verify_ultra_honk ./run_acir_tests.sh double_verify_nested_proof | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_and_verify_ultra_honk ./run_acir_tests.sh pedersen_hash | ||||||
| # Construct and verify a MegaHonk proof for a single arbitrary program | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_and_verify_mega_honk ./run_acir_tests.sh 6_array | ||||||
| # Construct and verify a UltraHonk proof for all ACIR programs using the new witness stack workflow | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_and_verify_ultra_honk_program ./run_acir_tests.sh | ||||||
| # Construct and verify a MegaHonk proof on one non-recursive program using the new witness stack workflow | ||||||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. oops forgot to fix this. Oh well |
||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_and_verify_ultra_honk_program ./run_acir_tests.sh merkle_insert | ||||||
| # Construct and verify a MegaHonk proof for all ACIR programs using the new witness stack workflow | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=prove_and_verify_mega_honk_program ./run_acir_tests.sh | ||||||
| # Fold and verify an ACIR program stack using ClientIvc | ||||||
| RUN FLOW=fold_and_verify_program ./run_acir_tests.sh fold_basic | ||||||
| # Run 1_mul through native bb build, all_cmds flow, to test all cli args. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason this one is pedersen and the other is sha256?
We should add a TODO for bringing back a double_verify_nested_proof
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nah, I was just picking different ones to increase variability. We should be able to bring this back in other PR which adds the verify_honk_proof test program.