Skip to content

feat: allow custom addresses to be prefunded with fee juice in local network (backport #21000)#21004

Merged
ludamad merged 2 commits intobackport-to-v4-stagingfrom
claudebox/4f9b6477992fa7de-1
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

feat: allow custom addresses to be prefunded with fee juice in local network (backport #21000)#21004
ludamad merged 2 commits intobackport-to-v4-stagingfrom
claudebox/4f9b6477992fa7de-1

Conversation

@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@AztecBot AztecBot commented Mar 2, 2026

Summary

Backport of #21000 to v4.

Commit 1: Cherry-pick with conflict markers

Applied PR #21000 diff to v4. The start_node.ts import section has conflict markers where the AztecAddress import could not be cleanly applied (the surrounding import context differs between next and v4 — v4 has additional imports like RegistryContract, sleep, EthAddress that were removed on next).

Commit 2: Resolve conflict

Added import { AztecAddress } from '@aztec/stdlib/aztec-address' in the correct location for v4 and removed the conflict markers.

Original PR by @mverzilli.

@AztecBot AztecBot added the claudebox Owned by claudebox. it can push to this PR. label Mar 2, 2026
@AztecBot AztecBot force-pushed the claudebox/4f9b6477992fa7de-1 branch from 88a2a00 to 1c67c32 Compare March 2, 2026 16:05
AztecBot added 2 commits March 2, 2026 16:08
…network (backport #21000)

Cherry-pick of PR #21000 with conflicts.
start_node.ts has conflict markers where the AztecAddress import
could not be cleanly applied (import context differs between next and v4).
@AztecBot AztecBot force-pushed the claudebox/4f9b6477992fa7de-1 branch from 1c67c32 to 2164b2b Compare March 2, 2026 16:08
@ludamad ludamad changed the base branch from v4 to backport-to-v4-staging March 2, 2026 16:14
@ludamad ludamad marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2026 16:58
@ludamad ludamad added the ci-full Run all master checks. label Mar 2, 2026
@ludamad ludamad merged commit 13c7cae into backport-to-v4-staging Mar 2, 2026
22 of 25 checks passed
@ludamad ludamad deleted the claudebox/4f9b6477992fa7de-1 branch March 2, 2026 18:10
mverzilli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
…network (backport #21000) (#21004)

## Summary
Backport of #21000
to v4.

### Commit 1: Cherry-pick with conflict markers
Applied PR #21000 diff to v4. The `start_node.ts` import section has
conflict markers where the `AztecAddress` import could not be cleanly
applied (the surrounding import context differs between `next` and `v4`
— v4 has additional imports like `RegistryContract`, `sleep`,
`EthAddress` that were removed on `next`).

### Commit 2: Resolve conflict
Added `import { AztecAddress } from '@aztec/stdlib/aztec-address'` in
the correct location for v4 and removed the conflict markers.

Original PR by @mverzilli.
ludamad added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
fix(aztec-nr): account for AES PKCS#7 padding in message plaintext
length (#20840)
feat: remove epk sign from message payload (#20926)
chore: increase mainnet local ejection threshold to 190k (#20884)
feat: add pinned-build support for protocol contracts in noir-contracts
(v4) (#20982)
fix!: undo bad fix (#20987)
chore: backport #20967 to v4 (metric on how many epochs validator has
been on committee) (#20989)
chore(sequencer): e2e tests for invalid signature recovery in checkpoint
attestations (#20971)
feat: allow custom addresses to be prefunded with fee juice in local
network (backport #21000) (#21004)
chore: increase max fee bots use in tests (#20867)
END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
mverzilli added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
Includes:

- [configurable prefunded addresses in local
network](#21004)

---------

Co-authored-by: Aztec Bot <49558828+AztecBot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-full Run all master checks. claudebox Owned by claudebox. it can push to this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants