Skip to content

Conversation

@cbersch
Copy link
Member

@cbersch cbersch commented Oct 11, 2025

Fix #72

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 93.962% (+0.01%) from 93.948%
when pulling 7fcf826 on fix-array-length-zero-or-one
into 14bfdef on main.

@cbersch cbersch marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2025 16:07
@cbersch cbersch requested a review from a team October 11, 2025 16:07
@cbersch cbersch self-assigned this Oct 11, 2025
@cbersch cbersch merged commit 10e62a5 into main Oct 11, 2025
8 checks passed
@cbersch cbersch added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 11, 2025
gritcsenko added a commit to gritcsenko/HomeInventory that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
…1282)

This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change | Age | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
[AwesomeAssertions.Analyzers](https://github.com/awesomeassertions/awesomeassertions.analyzers)
| `9.0.6` -> `9.0.8` |
[![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/nuget/AwesomeAssertions.Analyzers/9.0.8?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|
[![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/nuget/AwesomeAssertions.Analyzers/9.0.6/9.0.8?slim=true)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/)
|

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>awesomeassertions/awesomeassertions.analyzers
(AwesomeAssertions.Analyzers)</summary>

###
[`v9.0.8`](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers/releases/tag/v9.0.8)

<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml
at main -->

#### What's Changed

##### Fixes

- Do not suggest `[Not]Contains` if method parameter type differs from
collection type argument by
[@&#8203;cbersch](https://github.com/cbersch) in
[AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers#75](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers/pull/75)

**Full Changelog**:
<AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers@v9.0.7...v9.0.8>

###
[`v9.0.7`](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers/releases/tag/v9.0.7)

<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml
at main -->

#### What's Changed

##### Fixes

- Fix codefix for array length 0 or 1 by
[@&#8203;cbersch](https://github.com/cbersch) in
[AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers#73](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers/pull/73)

##### Dependencies

- chore(deps): update dependency xunit.runner.visualstudio to 3.1.5 by
[@&#8203;renovate](https://github.com/renovate)\[bot] in
[AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers#70](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers/pull/70)
- chore(deps): update benchmark-action/github-action-benchmark action to
v1.20.7 by
[@&#8203;renovate](https://github.com/renovate)\[bot] in
[AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers#69](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers/pull/69)

**Full Changelog**:
<AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions.analyzers@v9.0.6...v9.0.7>

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined),
Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you
are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/).
View the [repository job
log](https://developer.mend.io/github/gritcsenko/HomeInventory).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4xNDMuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQxLjE0My4xIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6W119-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better fix for array.Length.Should().Be(0|1)

4 participants