Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stats: Update feature slugs for Security upsell #99471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

a8ck3n
Copy link
Contributor

@a8ck3n a8ck3n commented Feb 7, 2025

Related to: #80536

Proposed Changes

Updates the array of feature slugs for the Security upsell. In this way, the upsell will still be shown if the user has a less-featured plan like basic Backups or Scan.

Why are these changes being made?

Previously a basic Scan plan would cause the Security upsell to be hidden. This was because it only declared support for the "scan" feature.

Testing Instructions

  • Set up local Odyssey env: PCYsg-Pp7-p2
  • Test on a site with no plans. All six upsells should be visible.
  • Add a Scan plan to the site.
  • Confirm the Security upsell is still visible.
  • Add a Complete plan to the site.
  • Confirm all upsells are hidden.

Pre-merge Checklist

  • Has the general commit checklist been followed? (PCYsg-hS-p2)
  • Have you written new tests for your changes?
  • Have you tested the feature in Simple (P9HQHe-k8-p2), Atomic (P9HQHe-jW-p2), and self-hosted Jetpack sites (PCYsg-g6b-p2)?
  • Have you checked for TypeScript, React or other console errors?
  • Have you used memoizing on expensive computations? More info in Memoizing with create-selector and Using memoizing selectors and Our Approach to Data
  • Have we added the "[Status] String Freeze" label as soon as any new strings were ready for translation (p4TIVU-5Jq-p2)?
    • For UI changes, have we tested the change in various languages (for example, ES, PT, FR, or DE)? The length of text and words vary significantly between languages.
  • For changes affecting Jetpack: Have we added the "[Status] Needs Privacy Updates" label if this pull request changes what data or activity we track or use (p4TIVU-aUh-p2)?

@a8ck3n a8ck3n self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
@a8ck3n a8ck3n added the [Feature] Stats Everything related to our analytics product at /stats/ label Feb 7, 2025
@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR modifies the release build for the following Calypso Apps:

For info about this notification, see here: PCYsg-OT6-p2

  • notifications
  • odyssey-stats
  • wpcom-block-editor

To test WordPress.com changes, run install-plugin.sh $pluginSlug update/stats-security-upsell-features on your sandbox.

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

Here is how your PR affects size of JS and CSS bundles shipped to the user's browser:

Async-loaded Components (~104 bytes added 📈 [gzipped])

name                                                      parsed_size           gzip_size
async-load-calypso-my-sites-stats-jetpack-upsell-section       +323 B  (+2.6%)     +104 B  (+2.3%)

React components that are loaded lazily, when a certain part of UI is displayed for the first time.

Legend

What is parsed and gzip size?

Parsed Size: Uncompressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much code needs to be parsed and stored in memory.
Gzip Size: Compressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much data needs to be downloaded over network.

Generated by performance advisor bot at iscalypsofastyet.com.

@a8ck3n a8ck3n marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 10:49
@a8ck3n a8ck3n requested a review from a team February 7, 2025 10:49
@matticbot matticbot added the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Initsogar Initsogar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! 👍🏽

✅ Navigated to the Stats page with a site that had no plan— all upsells were visible.
✅ Added a Scan plan— the same upsells were still visible.

CleanShot 2025-02-07 at 10 38 59@2x

✅ Tried adding a Backup plan to hide the backup upsell, just to double-check I wasn’t facing any cache issues with the previous step. 😃 The backup upsell was successfully hidden.

CleanShot 2025-02-07 at 10 40 55@2x

✅ Added a Jetpack Complete plan— all upsells were hidden as expected.
CleanShot 2025-02-07 at 10 42 11@2x

Copy link
Contributor

@dognose24 dognose24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am considering a situation where the plan will remove one of these features. This approach would require updating the list to reflect the change, but it might not be easy to be aware of. 🤔 However, it would not be a blocker of this PR.

@a8ck3n
Copy link
Contributor Author

a8ck3n commented Feb 8, 2025

I am considering a situation where the plan will remove one of these features. This approach would require updating the list to reflect the change, but it might not be easy to be aware of. 🤔 However, it would not be a blocker of this PR.

Yes, that's definitely an area this could be improved. The goal here was to fix the current version of the upsells based on the hard-coded listing. Two areas where this could be improved include:

  1. Pulling the list of upsells from an endpoint. In that way, they could be easily updated on the server side.
  2. Generating the list of feature slugs based on the individual upsells.

If we had both of these, we could remove most of the hard-coded config.

@kangzj kangzj merged commit 6023292 into trunk Feb 9, 2025
17 checks passed
@kangzj kangzj deleted the update/stats-security-upsell-features branch February 9, 2025 19:58
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Feature] Stats Everything related to our analytics product at /stats/
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants