Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(kafka_issues642): object format support data block group #887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

superhx
Copy link
Contributor

@superhx superhx commented Jan 8, 2024

@superhx superhx requested a review from SCNieh January 8, 2024 13:30
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1dab15a) 55.01% compared to head (4a7acb8) 54.98%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #887      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     55.01%   54.98%   -0.04%     
+ Complexity     1247     1243       -4     
============================================
  Files           133      133              
  Lines          8534     8534              
  Branches        789      789              
============================================
- Hits           4695     4692       -3     
  Misses         3425     3425              
- Partials        414      417       +3     
Components Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common 5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller 54.58% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Proxy 37.18% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
RocketMQ Store 73.60% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
RocketMQ Stream ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata 35.44% <ø> (ø)

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@superhx superhx merged commit d53d0f8 into main Jan 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@superhx superhx deleted the kafka_issues642 branch January 9, 2024 02:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants