feat: add task issue template - #368
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new GitHub issue template "Task" was added at ChangesTask Issue Template
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Review rate limit: 8/10 reviews remaining, refill in 8 minutes and 40 seconds. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new GitHub Issue Template for 'Task' to track maintainer or agent execution work. The template includes structured fields for defining goals, scope, context, and verification steps. A review comment suggests reordering the execution mode options to ensure the safest option is selected by default, aligning with the principle of least privilege.
Summary
Adds a third GitHub issue form for maintainer or agent execution tasks that are not user-facing bug reports or feature requests.
Why
PawWork currently has bug and feature intake forms. That is clear for users, but maintainer-created agent work sometimes needs a more execution-oriented brief: goal, scope, relevant context, verification, and whether the agent can implement directly or should investigate first.
Related Issue
No related issue. This PR adds the issue form discussed directly in the maintainer workflow.
Human Review Status
Pending. A human should make the final merge decision after reviewing the final diff and verification evidence.
Review Focus
Check whether the Task form is small enough for maintainers to use while still giving coding agents enough context to execute safely.
Risk Notes
Low risk. This only adds a new issue template. The template references a
tasklabel; GitHub only auto-applies labels that already exist, so the repository should create thetasklabel before relying on automatic labeling.How To Verify
Screenshots or Recordings
Not applicable. This is a GitHub metadata change, not a visible app UI change.
Checklist
dev, and my PR title and commit messages use Conventional Commits in EnglishSummary by CodeRabbit