Skip to content

Conversation

@Dinonard
Copy link
Contributor

@Dinonard Dinonard commented Aug 4, 2022

Pull Request Summary

Uplift to polkadot-v0.9.27.
No major functionality changes in our code.

Check list

  • updated spec version
  • updated semver

@Dinonard Dinonard marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2022 06:55
@Dinonard Dinonard requested review from akru and shunsukew and removed request for akru August 5, 2022 06:55
bool,
) -> Result<Box<dyn ParachainConsensus<Block>>, sc_service::Error>,
{
if matches!(parachain_config.role, Role::Light) {
Copy link
Contributor

@shunsukew shunsukew Aug 5, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this means we got LightClient configuration part somewhere instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know where it is, all I've found is that it was removed from substrate.
To do the uplift, I removed the enum mention.

Copy link
Contributor

@shunsukew shunsukew Aug 5, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This shouldn't impact other types of nodes. We'd like to keep up with the LightClient development situation on Substrate side I think.

It's deprecated, no need for validation anymore.
paritytech/substrate#11865

@shunsukew shunsukew self-requested a review August 5, 2022 09:38
@Dinonard Dinonard merged commit e097c38 into master Aug 5, 2022
@Dinonard Dinonard deleted the feature/polkadot-v0.9.27 branch August 5, 2022 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants