docs(taxonomy): #499 Virtues AIF PR-10 — Argument pertinent 1.3 Interprétation juste (complete family 1) + Cause to Effect parcimonie + 1371 native parallel of 1398

[jsboige]

Summary

10th cluster of Virtues AIF I/RA/CA decomposition (schema #707§4 Option A ratified). Covers family 1 Argument pertinent / subfamily 1.3 Interprétation juste (anchor pk 28 + leaves 29/30/31 + sub-leaves 32/33). 4 schemes: Argument from Sign (28) + Verbal Classification (29) + Bias (30) + Cause to Effect (31/32/33, parcimonie sub-species).

Follows PR #741-#751 (9 clusters + plan back-fill v2; #741-#749 merged 01721c39, #750-#751 OPEN). Same method. Docs-only, no code/CSV/DB/OWL writes.

🔑 KEY CONTRIBUTION 1 — completes family 1 (3/3 subfamilies) + validates Cause to Effect on the parcimonie sub-species

Family 1 « Argument pertinent » is now covered on all 3 subfamilies (1.1 Argument fondé ✅PR-7, 1.2 Prémisses fiables ✅PR-8, 1.3 Interprétation juste ✅PR-10). 33 nodes of family 1 are now decomposed I/RA/CA.

PR-10 also validates Argument from Cause to Effect on the parcimonie sub-species (Ockham's + Hanlon's razors) — a Cause-to-Effect sub-mechanism not yet observed (PR-1 4.1 covered the basic causal link; 31/32/33 cover parsimony of the causal explanation). The opposed fallacies (165 Manque de parcimonie, 1287 Pseudo-explication, 707 Inversion de causalité) all break the parsimonious causal inference → undercut / RA-node.

Confirms (with PR-1, PR-5, PR-7, PR-8, PR-9): the deterministic rule of plan #750 holds on 10 clusters / 13 schemes. No leaf of 1.3 opposes 889/804 (mine) or 340 (rebut) → pure mechanical default undercut/RA-node.

🔑 KEY CONTRIBUTION 2 — 1371 Sophisme génétique = structural parallel of 1398 Attaque personnelle (relational fallacy = detournement, reinforces rebut-rarity)

PR-9 documented 1398 Attaque personnelle as the native negation of rebuttal (« au lieu de réfuter ») — the first native (taxonomy-text) proof that relational fallacies are detournements (undercut/RA), not refutations (rebut/CA).

PR-10 documents the structural parallel on 1371 Sophisme génétique:

• « Vous rejetez une idée en critiquant son origine plutôt que son contenu ».
• Like 1398, the fallacy rejects the conclusion — but without presenting an independent counter-conclusion: it diverts attention from the argument to the origin (genetic/credibility attack).
• → undercut / RA-node, explicitly NOT rebut.

Double native confirmation (1398 on the person + 1371 on the origin): relational fallacies (ad hominem, genetic) reject without refuting → the taxonomy definition itself encodes that rejection goes via detournement (undercut), not refutation (rebut). Reinforces rebut-rarity with a 2nd native proof (taxonomy text), in addition to the empirical one (scan/cluster).

Distribution cluster 1.3 — 12/12 undercut/RA-node (uniform), 0 mine, 0 rebut

Interpretation fallacies (selective attention 953, bad reasons 153, over-complication 1345, trivial justification 33, theoretical bias 1242, lack of parsimony 165, pseudo-explanation 1287, causal inversion 707, genetic fallacy 1371) are all inference failures: none asserts a fabricated premise, none presents a counter-conclusion (1371 denies it structurally, like 1398).

Virtue pk	Fallacy	attackType	attackedNode
28 (anchor)	953 Attention sélective	undercut	RA-node
28 (anchor)	153 Argument des mauvaises raisons	undercut	RA-node
29	1345 Complication exagérée	undercut	RA-node
29	33 Justification triviale	undercut	RA-node
30	953 Attention sélective	undercut	RA-node
30	1242 Biais théoriques	undercut	RA-node
31	165 Manque de parcimonie	undercut	RA-node
31	1345 Complication exagérée	undercut	RA-node
32	165 Manque de parcimonie	undercut	RA-node
32	1287 Pseudo-explication	undercut	RA-node
33	707 Inversion de causalité	undercut	RA-node
33	1371 Sophisme génétique	undercut	RA-node

⚠️ Disambiguation (load-bearing): Fallacy pk 165 « Manque de parcimonie » (Insuffisance/Surinterprétation) is NOT the Virtue pk 165 « Identifier les points de vigilance » (Argument from Danger, family 6.2, which opposes Fallacy 340 and is inferred rebut/CA in plan #750). Fallacy and Virtue PK spaces are distinct. Here 165 always denotes the Fallacy.

Cumulative rebut-rarity (10 clusters, load-bearing)

Cluster	Subfamily	Family	Schemes	mine	undercut	rebut
PR-1	4.1	Raisonnement	Cause to Effect	0	6	0
PR-2	6.1	Honnêteté	Witness/Bias	1	2	0
PR-3	7.3	Échange	Commitment	0	6	0
PR-4	5.1	Langage	Verbal Cl./Expert	3	7	0
PR-5	3.1	Rigueur math	Example/Rule/Analogy	0	6	0
PR-6	2.2	Présentation	Bias/Consequences	0	4	2
PR-7	1.1	Argument pertinent	Sign/Bias	0	6	0
PR-8	1.2	Argument pertinent	Position to Know/Bias	0	6	0
PR-9	2.1.2	Présentation	Values	0	8	0
PR-10	1.3	Argument pertinent	Sign/Verbal Cl./Bias/Cause to Effect	0	12	0
Cumul	10 subfamilies	7 families / 13 schemes		4	63	2

rebut/CA-node = 2 across 10 families / 13 scheme-types / ~69 fallacy-instances. rebut stays absent on the complete family 1 (1.1 + 1.2 + 1.3) — interpretation fallacies don't deny the conclusion, they defeat the inference (biased selection, over-complexification, causal inversion, genetic rejection). rebut is localized + predictable: Consequences (PK 340) only. The rebut override {340} of plan #750 holds. 1371 = 2nd native proof that relational fallacies = detournements (undercut), not refutations (rebut).

Scheme coverage

13/14 schemes covered (~90% of taxonomy by node count), all 9 most represented validated. PR-10 does NOT add a new scheme (Sign/Verbal Cl./Bias/Cause to Effect already validated) — it extends Cause to Effect to the parcimonie sub-species and confirms the default on the last uncovered subfamily of family 1. Remaining: Danger (1 node, pk 165 — verdict rebut/CA already inferred from the 340 mechanism in plan #750).

Milestone: family 1 « Argument pertinent » COMPLETE (3/3 subfamilies: 1.1 + 1.2 + 1.3, 33 nodes decomposed).

Discipline

• ✅ Read body before action: family 1 structure enumerated (33 nodes, 3 subfamilies); phase-2 argument-annotations.csv read (6 annotated 1.3 nodes: scheme + CQ + opposes + justification); 9 opposed-fallacy descriptions read (953/153/1345/33/1242/165/1287/707/1371) before attack-type derivation; anti-duplication grep confirmed (9 docs matching RA-node/attackType in docs/taxonomy/499-*.md = my own merged clusters + plan; argument.md phase-2 = 0 I/RA/CA token → additive layer).
• ✅ 0 fabrication (docs(taxonomy): #141 crossLink enrichment sample run (real output curated from #626) #677): Sign/Verbal Cl./Bias/Cause to Effect/undercut/RA-node all native AIF/Walton.
• ✅ Fallacy 165 ≠ Virtue 165 disambiguation documented load-bearing (distinct PK spaces).
• ✅ 1371 documented as native parallel of 1398 — 2nd native proof of rebut-rarity (rejection without refutation = detournement), not ideological forcing of the rebut set.
• ✅ 953/1242/1287 honestly classified undercut (selection/framework/tool-misuse = inference treatment), consistent with PR-7 + docs(taxonomy): #499 Virtues AIF back-fill plan v2 — refine overrides (804 clean mine + rebut {340}) + distribution exacte 206/13/3 #750 §2a.
• ✅ Cause to Effect parcimonie = RA-node paradigmatic documented (razors = parsimonious Cause to Effect Application; 165/1287/707 = failure archetypes), not forced.
• ✅ 0 code change, 0 write Cards/, 0 regen, 0 CSV/DB/OWL. Docs-only (+160 lines).
• ❌ Does NOT touch [runtime pending] feat(dnn): #649 RulesExplorer i18n — mirror loc() culture cascade #674/[HOLD post-tag] fix(cardpen): #629 convert relative /Cards paths to raw-master URLs (Option 1) #666/chore(dnn): #131 migrate 12 RazorComponent templates to Razor14 (source-level, runtime pending) #596 (HOLD). Back-fill execution still GATED (po-2023 column contract feat(ontology): modéliser les sophismes comme exceptions à des schemes (paradigme AIF/Walton), au-delà des ~20 natifs #498 not on master, stall detected).

Test impact

None — docs-only.

Request

Review + (if acceptable) merge. This cluster (a) completes family 1 (3/3 subfamilies, 33 nodes decomposed), (b) validates Cause to Effect on the parcimonie sub-species (Ockham/Hanlon razors), (c) documents 1371 Sophisme génétique as the native parallel of 1398 Attaque personnelle — a 2nd native taxonomy-text proof of rebut-rarity (rejection without refutation = detournement). All three findings feed back into PR #750 (back-fill plan) — no change to the plan's rule, but strengthened confidence in the rebut-rarity finding (now with a 2nd native proof).

cc @jsboige (Option A FYI).

🤖 Worker po-2024 — [primaire] cluster 10 of dispatch ompwhx deep-queue.