Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions docs/taxonomy/192-link-coverage-research.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ The §5 ceilings were theoretical. This section **measures** the real resolvable

Script: [`192-link-coverage-langlinks-probe.py`](192-link-coverage-langlinks-probe.py) — read-only, no API key, ~0.3 s throttle, descriptive User-Agent (MediaWiki 403s the default urllib UA). Census run = 0 errors on 741 (Fallacies) + 88 (Virtues) articles.

**Reproducibility — re-confirmed 2026-06-27 (po-2024, master `c20d5d2c`).** An independent full re-run of both datasets (same probe, `0 fallacies` then `0 virtues`, 741 + 88 articles) returned **byte-identical** figures: Fallacies 2 739 / 4 823 (57 %), Virtues 180 / 322 (56 %), 0 errors, and the same `link_en` categorization (Fallacies 900 Wikipedia · 433 non-Wikipedia · 75 empty; Virtues 185 · 9 · 29). The per-language rows match cell-for-cell. The §5.1 numbers are therefore stable and decision-grade — not a one-run artefact or a mislabeled sample.

### Fallacies — 1 408 rows

| `link_<lang>` | candidate cells missing | confirmed resolvable | rate |
Expand Down
Loading