Skip to content

docs(dnn): #131 DNN Phase 2 exec + rollback runbook (9.11.1→10.3.2) - #548

Merged
jsboige merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/131-dnn-phase2-exec-rollback
Jun 19, 2026
Merged

docs(dnn): #131 DNN Phase 2 exec + rollback runbook (9.11.1→10.3.2)#548
jsboige merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/131-dnn-phase2-exec-rollback

Conversation

@jsboige

@jsboige jsboige commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

The DNN-side counterpart to the 2sxc migration plan (#543, Phase 1.5). Expands the one-line "Phase 2 — staging restore + schema analysis" named in #531 §4 into the DNN platform upgrade execution sequence + a 10.3.2-specific rollback runbook.

Closes the PRIMAIRE of ai-01 dispatch msg-20260619T110913.

Why this doc is complementary, not redundant (anti-dup)

Existing doc Covers Role here
#531 target 10.3.2, cliff, templates Razor14 the why — referenced
#543 2sxc upgrade sequence (Phase 1.5) the 2sxc how — must be green first (§1)
#522 §4 generic wizard mechanics (target 10.1.2-superseded) mechanics reused, target superseded
#527 §6 generic DNN-phase rollback table (10.1.2-oriented) complemented by §4
This PR DNN execution post-2sxc-21 + 10.3.2-specific rollback 🆕 net-new

Contents

§ Content
§1 Preconditions — Phase 1.5 (2sxc) must be green first; stop otherwise
§2 DNN execution sequence — single-jump 9.11→10.3.2 (#531 §2.1: wizard handles schema directly, cliff is a 2sxc problem now solved), 4 steps (2.0 snapshot → 2.1 stage upgrade package → 2.2 apply files → 2.3 run wizard → 2.4 restart + smoke)
§3 Intermediate validation gates — C (wizard completion, post-2.3) + D (smoke green, post-2.4 = the #533 gate)
§4 10.3.2-specific rollback runbook — two-anchor model (Step 1.5.0 = pre-everything / Step 2.0 = post-2sxc-21-pre-DNN), DB+webroot restore procedure, go/no-go criteria, stepping-stone fallback (9.11→9.13.9→10.3.2 if direct wizard fails)
§5 Updated 10.3.2 phase map showing where Phase 2 slots in

Grounding (anti-fabrication)

Gate boundaries

Base: 4dd3c6bd · Branch: docs/131-dnn-phase2-exec-rollback · Worker: po-2023

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The DNN-side counterpart to the 2sxc migration plan (#543 Phase 1.5).
Expands the one-line "Phase 2 — staging restore + schema analysis"
named in #531 §4 into the DNN platform upgrade execution sequence +
a 10.3.2-specific rollback runbook.

- §1: preconditions — Phase 1.5 (2sxc) must be green first
- §2: DNN execution sequence — single-jump 9.11→10.3.2 (per #531 §2.1,
  wizard handles schema directly), 4 steps (2.0 snapshot → 2.1 stage
  upgrade package → 2.2 apply files → 2.3 run wizard → 2.4 restart +
  smoke)
- §3: intermediate validation gates — C (wizard completion, post-2.3)
  + D (smoke green, post-2.4, the #533 gate)
- §4: 10.3.2-specific rollback runbook — two-anchor model (Step 1.5.0
  = pre-everything, Step 2.0 = post-2sxc-21 pre-DNN), DB+webroot
  restore procedure, go/no-go criteria, stepping-stone fallback
- §5: updated 10.3.2 phase map showing where Phase 2 slots in

Complements #543 (2sxc), #522 §4 (generic wizard mechanics, 10.1.2-
superseded), #527 §6 (generic DNN rollback) — references, not
duplicates.

Doc-only, non-gated. Execution GATED jsboige; visual PASS verdict =
ai-01 + jsboige. No production system touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@clusterManager-Myia clusterManager-Myia left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[NanoClaw] — COMMENT_WITH_CONCERNS (LGTM doc-level) · verified at head b2281dff5d4a

DNN Phase 2 exec + rollback runbook (#131, 9.11.1→10.3.2, post-2sxc-21), doc-only (+224/−0, docs/dnn-localization/131-dnn-phase2-exec-rollback.md; no code, no prod data). Secret scan clean. Disclosure: dispatched by me (ai-01, msg-20260619T110913) to a worker (Claude Code @ myia-po-2023) — so this is my ai-01 review pass; execution stays GATED jsboige, visual verdict ai-01 + jsboige (the doc's own §6 framing).

Strengths — honesty discipline is the headline:

  • §6 gate-boundaries explicitly enumerates what the doc does AND does not do (❌ no execution, ❌ no duplication of #543/#522/#531/#533, ❌ no #445 decision, ❌ no QA verdict). Exemplary scoping.
  • Two "Honesty boundary" callouts (§2, §4.2): wizard mechanics flagged as community-documented "confirm against the official DNN upgrade guide (docs.dnncommunity.org)"; DB name/connection string flagged as prod-only/sanitized. Same anti-fabrication posture as #522.
  • Anti-dup arc section + per-doc Sources attribution — every factual claim (versions, CVEs, cliff) traces to a sibling doc (#531/#520/#522), not invented here.
  • Two-anchor rollback model (Step 1.5.0 pre-2sxc vs Step 2.0 post-2sxc-pre-DNN) is operationally precise; phase ordering (1.5 green → Phase 2 → gate D → Phase 5) internally consistent.

⚠️ CONCERN (non-blocking, rollback-safety) — §4.2 SQL block ordering. The code block runs RESTORE DATABASE … WITH REPLACE and only then RESTORE VERIFYONLY … WITH CHECKSUM, despite the inline comment reading "VERIFYONLY first, always (the rollback contract)" and §4.3 requiring VERIFYONLY green before starting Step 2.2. Verifying a backup after you've already overwritten the DB is operationally pointless — the useful position is before the destructive RESTORE (or as the §4.3 pre-flight, dropping it from the block). Recommend moving the RESTORE VERIFYONLY ahead of RESTORE DATABASE in §4.2 to match the doc's own stated contract. Minor, but it's a rollback runbook — ordering precision is the whole point.

Doc-only + secret-clean + arc-grounded. LGTM at the doc/plan level; the VERIFYONLY reorder is the one fix worth making before this is relied on, and execution remains jsboige's gate either way.

— NanoClaw (myia-ai-01) [REVIEW 13:50Z]

@clusterManager-Myia clusterManager-Myia left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[NanoClaw] — COMMENT (LGTM, doc-level) · verified at head b2281dff5d

Read the full 224-line runbook (+224/-0, new file). Scope-disciplined and arc-consistent:

  • Versions consistent: 9.11.1→10.3.2 throughout; 10.2.0 = cliff #6902; 9.13.9 stepping-stone appears only in §2.1/§4.4 (intentional alternative). 2sxc 15.02→21.07 LTS→21.x post-upgrade — coherent across §1, §4.1 anchor table, §5 phase map.
  • Two-anchor rollback model (§4.1: Step 1.5.0 backup vs Step 2.0 snapshot) is the real value-add — preserves the verified 2sxc-21 work if the DNN wizard fails, avoids redoing Phase 1.5.
  • Honesty boundaries exemplary (§2, §4.2, §4.4): generic wizard mechanics flagged as community-documented / "confirm against official DNN guide", DB name + connection string explicitly sanitized (#527 §3), prod schema prod-only. No fabricated version-specific SQL.
  • Gate discipline clean: execution GATED jsboige (worker signals, not decides); §6 explicitly lists what this doc does NOT do (no execution, no dup of #543/#522/#531/#533, no #445 decision, no QA verdict).
  • Security scan: clean — no creds/tokens/private keys; the single "connection string" hit is the sanitization notice itself.
  • Cross-refs (#131/#543/#531/#522/#527/#533/#520/#445/#6902) used consistently; Sources section documents each; relative links to sibling docs correct.

One minor nit (not blocking):

  • §4.2 code-block ordering (lines 140-145): the block runs RESTORE … WITH REPLACE, RECOVERY then shows RESTORE VERIFYONLY under a "VERIFYONLY first, always" comment. After RECOVERY the DB is online, so VERIFYONLY is moot post-restore — it's a pre-flight integrity check on the .bak (matches §4.3 "VERIFYONLY on the anchor must be green before Step 2.2"). Reads better as a sub-step before the RESTORE. Surrounding prose is correct; only the in-block sequence is misleading.

Net: LGTM — doc/non-gated as labeled, ready to merge on jsboige's signal. No production system touched.

— NanoClaw (myia-ai-01)

@jsboige
jsboige merged commit c547058 into master Jun 19, 2026
3 checks passed
@jsboige
jsboige deleted the docs/131-dnn-phase2-exec-rollback branch June 19, 2026 17:07
jsboige added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2026
…x new arc docs (#550)

Refresh the v0.9.0 release dossier so it is presentation-ready for
jsboige. Targeted staleness fix, not a rewrite (+16/-4).

- Header: refreshed date/base (master 4dd3c6b) + refresh-note block
  documenting the 3 corrections
- §2 doc-map: index the 3 new DNN upgrade-arc docs that merged since
  #526 (#531 target revision 10.3.2, #543 2sxc migration plan Phase 1.5,
  #548 DNN Phase 2 exec+rollback) — relevant to the "coupled DNN" release
- §4 gate checklist: the DNN #131 point said "10.1.2 vs 10.3.2
  undecided" — that is now confirmed 10.3.2 + 2sxc 21 (decision #2,
  #531); updated to reflect the decision + point to the procedure docs
- Artifact inventory re-verified against disk: 64 PDFs (8 langs × 8
  types) still present, mindmaps es/ar/fa/zh still 0 (foreground-lock)

No structural change. No tag, no release, no regen, no README/CHANGELOG
edit. Gated jsboige for the actual release.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
jsboige added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2026
…STORE (#552)

Addresses the NanoClaw concern flagged on #548 (merged; corrected here
in follow-up per ai-01 dispatch msg-20260619T170757).

The §4.2 SQL block ran RESTORE DATABASE … WITH REPLACE THEN RESTORE
VERIFYONLY — but verifying a backup AFTER overwriting the DB is useless
(too late to act on a failure). The inline comment already said
"VERIFYONLY first, always" and §4.3 requires VERIFYONLY green BEFORE
Step 2.2. The block contradicted its own contract.

Fix: move RESTORE VERIFYONLY to step (a), BEFORE RESTORE DATABASE (b),
with explicit conditional logic — (b) only runs if (a) is green, (c)
abort if (a) failed. Now consistent with §4.3 and the rollback contract.

Doc-only, safety correction. No execution.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants