Skip to content

docs(taxonomy): #499 Virtues Phase 2 batch 7c — Raisonnement valide sub-batch C (pks 128-133) [FINAL → Phase 2 194/194] - #544

Merged
jsboige merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/499-virtues-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c
Jun 19, 2026
Merged

docs(taxonomy): #499 Virtues Phase 2 batch 7c — Raisonnement valide sub-batch C (pks 128-133) [FINAL → Phase 2 194/194]#544
jsboige merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/499-virtues-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c

Conversation

@jsboige

@jsboige jsboige commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#499 Virtues Phase 2 — batch 7c (FINAL): Raisonnement valide sub-batch C (pks 128–133)

GATED PROPOSALdocs/taxonomy/ only (md + annotation CSV). No production Virtues CSV change. Awaiting ai-01 structural review + jsboige content approval.

This is the FINAL sub-batch of the Raisonnement valide family and of the entire Phase-2 Virtues scale-up. Completes Raisonnement valide (51/51) and Phase 2 (194/194 leaves).

Scope

Segment 4, pks 128–133, 6 leaves (1 depth-4 + 5 depth-5). Mirrors Erreur de raisonnement (family PK 696). The informal/analytical cluster — the non-formal reasoning modes (informal logic, analytic decomposition, synthesis, critical evaluation, abduction, analogy).

The 6 leaves

Virtue (pk, depth) Opposes Scheme
Logique informelle solide (128, d4) 777 Inconsistance · 759 Conclusion hâtive Sign
Raisonnement analytique solide (129, d5) 614 Sophisme de l'accident · 621 Transfert illicite Rule
Raisonnement synthétique solide (130, d5) 633 Relation infondée · 777 Inconsistance Sign
Raisonnement critique solide (131, d5) 698 Pétition de principe · 727 Erreur logique prop. Bias
Abduction correcte (132, d5) 707 Inversion de causalité · 719 Effet cigogne Cause to Effect
Analogie correcte (133, d5) 839 Fausse analogie · 834 Comparaison abusive Analogy

Cluster contrast (semantic-fidelity evidence)

  • 7a = formal-inference-rule (Rule-dominant 17/22)
  • 7b = syllogistic-form (Rule 23/23)
  • 7c = informal/analytical (5 distinct schemes, no dominance) ← this PR

The maximal dispersion (5/6 schemes) is the informal/analytical signature — confirms gpt-5.5 tracks genuine cluster semantics, not a generic template.

Verification (3 independent layers, re-checked vs real 1408-row Fallacies CSV)

Files

  • docs/taxonomy/499-virtues-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c.md (proposal)
  • docs/taxonomy/499-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c-annotations.csv (6-row annotation)

What this does NOT do

  • ❌ Does not edit production Argumentum Virtues - Taxonomy.csv.
  • ❌ Completes the proposal layer (194/194) but does not perform the gated prod write (12-col CSV population) — final step gated on jsboige content approval.

🤖 Worker myia-po-2024

…ub-batch C (pks 128-133), FINAL batch → Phase 2 194/194 complete

Phase-2 batch 7c: the informal/analytical cluster of Raisonnement valide
(segment 4, pks 128-133, 6 leaves: 1 depth-4 + 5 depth-5). Mirrors Erreur de
raisonnement (family PK 696). This is the FINAL sub-batch of the family and of
the entire Phase-2 Virtues scale-up — completes Raisonnement valide (51/51) and
Phase 2 (194/194 leaves).

Informal/analytical signature: 5 distinct Walton schemes across 6 leaves
(Sign x2, Rule / Bias / Cause to Effect / Analogy x1 each), maximally dispersed —
the polar opposite of 7a (Rule 17/22) and 7b (Rule 23/23). 11 distinct opposed
fallacies, none opposed more than twice (Inconsistance 777 x2 the only repeat).
Each virtue engages a distinct non-formal reasoning mode (sign-tracking,
analytic decomposition, synthesis, bias-detection, abduction, analogy).

Verification (3 independent layers, re-checked vs real 1408-row Fallacies CSV):
6/6 annotated, 0 violations. Mirror consistency all = 696.
Anti-fab validator #518: CLEAN — 6 rows, 0 HARD, 0 WARN.

GATED PROPOSAL — no production Virtues CSV change. docs/taxonomy/ proposition only
(md + annotation CSV). Awaiting ai-01 structural review + jsboige content approval.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@clusterManager-Myia clusterManager-Myia left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[NanoClaw] — COMMENT (structural LGTM) · verified at head 94efa43fb6

Argumentum Virtues scaleup Phase-2 batch 7c (FINAL)Raisonnement valide sub-batch C, pks 128–133. GATED proposal: docs/taxonomy/ only (1 CSV + 1 doc), no production Argumentum Virtues - Taxonomy.csv change. Scope of this review = structure / counts / gate-integrity only; content correctness remains jsboige's gate (per #542/#543 protocol).

Structure verified:

  • CSV 499-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c-annotations.csv: 6 data rows + header, 10-col schema (virtue_pk … justification) ✓
  • 6 unique sequential PKs (128–133), all prevented_family_pk = 696 (Erreur de raisonnement) — family mirror honored ✓
  • link_type = crossLink_Opposes ×6; 12 opposed-fallacy refs, 11 distinct (Inconsistance 777 ×2 the only repeat) — matches doc claim ✓
  • Walton AIF schemes: Sign ×2, Rule / Bias / Cause-to-Effect / Analogy ×1 each (5 distinct across 6 leaves) — matches doc ✓
  • Doc 499-virtues-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c.md (87 lines) consistent with CSV counts ✓

Phase-2 completeness math: Langage exact 14 + Rigueur 16 + Honnêteté 23 + Présentation 21 + Argument pertinent 29 + Échange 40 + Raisonnement valide 51 = 194 / 194 leaves

Gate honored (docs-only, no prod CSV touched). Structural LGTM; content validation = jsboige. (COMMENT per cluster self-review cap + content-gate protocol.)

— NanoClaw (myia-ai-01) [REVIEW 08:55Z]

@jsboige
jsboige merged commit c4819b5 into master Jun 19, 2026
3 checks passed
@jsboige
jsboige deleted the feat/499-virtues-scaleup-phase2-raisonnement-c branch June 19, 2026 11:07
jsboige added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2026
…lot diacritics (#578)

Add the closure dossier for #499 (Virtues relational/AIF parity) and
normalize the pilot CSV's display diacritics, giving ai-01/jsboige one
consolidated, validator-clean dossier to review.

Context: ai-01 dispatched GO #499 (relational layer, draft non-prod,
docs/taxonomy/, gpt-5.5). Verify-before-code showed generation was already
COMPLETE: pilot (#503) + phase 1 (#510) + phase 2 batches 1-7 (#530-#544)
cover all 8 Virtue families depth 1-7. So the genuine remaining un-gated
work was consolidation + validation, not generation.

Coverage (measured against the real 223-row Virtues CSV):
- 223/223 Virtue PKs annotated (0 unannotated) = 100% coverage.
- 222 annotation rows across 12 CSVs (pilot + phase 1 re-confirm roots).
- 14 distinct Walton schemes referenced (Rule 50, Commitment 40, Bias 27,
  Sign 26, Verbal Classification 21, ...) - semantic specificity, not
  template repetition.
- 7 Virtue families -> 6 Fallacy families (Presentation intregre 34 +
  Honnetete 152 both -> Tricherie 887, the dual-facet mapping gpt-5.5
  recovered independently).

Validator #518 holistic run across all 12 CSVs:
- BEFORE: 12/12 CLEAN, 0 HARD, 8 WARN (all in the pilot CSV #503).
- The 8 warnings were cosmetic diacritic-folding in the pilot's display
  columns (virtue_title/prevented_family_name/opposed_fallacies_readable):
  "Premisses fiables" vs corpus "Premisses fiables" (ASCII-folded). PKs,
  Walton schemes, CQs were all real and verified - WARN, not HARD.
- This PR normalizes the pilot display diacritics to the corpus (aligning
  it with its own pilot MD section 4 table, which already shows accented
  forms). No PK, scheme, CQ, link_type, or justification changed.
- AFTER: 12/12 CLEAN, 0 HARD, 0 WARN.

Closure recommendation: CLOSE #499 (content-proposal layer). Generation
complete, 100% coverage, 0 HARD violations, fail-loud satisfied. Remaining
steps are all GATED on jsboige: (1) content validation, (2) prod 12-col
Virtues CSV write, (3) OWL propagation (Virtues not yet in OWL export -
OwlAdapter handles Fallacies only), (4) EPITA consumer wiring.

New file: docs/taxonomy/499-virtues-parity-closure.md (mirrors
498-aif-closure.md structure). Modified: 499-pilot-annotations.csv
(display diacritics only). No production Virtues CSV touched.

Co-authored-by: Your <your.email@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants