images famille 1 - #5
Merged
ThomasWatanabeVermorel merged 1 commit intoApr 27, 2020
Merged
Conversation
enlevé des fonds blancs inutiles
jsboige
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2025
images famille 1 Former-commit-id: 3745a08 Former-commit-id: 9c92dcf1c09fc8e0d81e416b0e8375f29574ff20
3 tasks
jsboige
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2026
…rget, recommend closure (#547) Closure assessment for #498 (dispatched by ai-01, PRIMARY). Evaluates cluster-level coverage against the #498 target and recommends CLOSURE of #498 (content-proposal layer), with phase-4 mopup documented as optional finish. Key findings (all verified against the real 1408-row prod Fallacies CSV, master 4dd3c6b): - 70 direct cluster AIF mappings (depth 2-4), broadMatch-dominant (57/10/3) — intact, no regression from phases 1-3. - Effective coverage by inheritance: 1292/1408 = 91.8% (direct+inherited). - The "~31% (442/1408)" figure in the issue body is jsboige's measure with unspecified derivation — recorded transparently rather than reproduced (DoD #5 fail-loud on the metric). - Generative work (phases 1-3): 50 depth-3 leaves with full triple-AIF exception structures, 17 distinct Walton schemes, 49 distinct CA-nodes. rebut-type progression (absent phases 1-2, appears phase 3) is independent semantic-fidelity evidence. - Phase-4 mopup (13 remaining depth-3 leaves) is OPTIONAL, not a gap: all 13 already carry native cluster AIF skos mappings in prod. Phase 4 would add generative density (50->63/63), not coverage. - Fail-loud: the 4 unmapped depth-2 categorical parents (Technique rhetorique, Appel a l'emotion, Conclusion mathematique invalide, Sabotage du debat) are category umbrellas whose children carry the mapping — no scheme fabricated. DoD assessment: #1 (numbering) met, #2 (generative structures) met for 50 leaves, #3 (mapping-type coherence) met, #4 (fail-loud) met. No coverage gap. Recommends closure; gated prod write + OWL regen + jsboige content validation remain as separate downstream gates. Doc-only gated. No production data changed. Co-authored-by: Your <your.email@example.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
enlevé des fonds blancs inutiles