Skip to content

data(virtues): EN cascade pass gpt-5.5 — 5 'remark_en' field edits (smoke) - #374

Merged
jsboige merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
data/virtues-cascade-en-smoke
May 28, 2026
Merged

data(virtues): EN cascade pass gpt-5.5 — 5 'remark_en' field edits (smoke)#374
jsboige merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
data/virtues-cascade-en-smoke

Conversation

@jsboige

@jsboige jsboige commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Third smoke test of the new cascade EN-only pattern (PR #371). Validates the approach on Virtues taxonomy.

Parameters: ChunkSize=6, TakeChunkNb=1, processed virtues 0–5.
Cost: ~$0.30, 12s, 0 errors.

Changes (5 surgical UpdateRecord on remark_en only)

pk Virtue Type of fix
0 Valid argument (root) Condensed verbose intro to match FR brevity
1 Relevant argument Abstract → concrete tobacco/public-health example
2 Grounded argument Removed jargon, added "defending a measure by citing reliable figures" example
3 Established facts "tangible, precise information" → "verifiable statistics, scientific studies"
5 Inductive Quoted swans → narrative "After observing one hundred white swans..."

Validation

  • Field scope: only remark_en edited (out of 3 EN fields available: title_en, description_en, remark_en)
  • LLM honored prompt-level priority remark_* > description_* > title_*
  • Other-lang columns untouched (column-level diff zero)
  • Style: more concise, concrete examples mirroring FR (PR data(virtues): FR clarity pass gpt-5.5 (223/223, 516 cells) #367)
  • BOM: Virtues has no BOM → preserved

Test plan

  • Smoke ran cleanly, 5 UpdateRecord, 0 errors
  • Non-EN columns untouched
  • Each edit visibly aligns with FR clarity pass
  • Visual inspection of Virtues cards (jsboige to schedule)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…records)

Smoke test of "Virtues cascade EN-only gpt-5.5" task, validating the
max-context narrow-edit approach on Virtues (FR readonly anchor, EN editable).

ChunkSize=6, TakeChunkNb=1 → processed virtues 0-5 (Arguments vertueux,
Argument pertinent, Argument étayé, Argument fondé, Inductif), LLM made 5
surgical edits on `remark_en` (priority field per prompt: remark > description > title):

- pk 0 (Valid arguments): Condensed verbose intro to "A valid argument rests
  on clear evidence..." matching FR brevity
- pk 1 (Relevant argument): Replaced abstract paragraph with concrete tobacco/
  public-health example mirroring FR style
- pk 2 (Grounded argument): Replaced "outcome of analytical work" jargon with
  "defending a measure by citing reliable figures" example
- pk 3 (Established facts): "tangible, precise information supported by..." →
  "verifiable statistics, scientific studies, or documented historical examples"
- pk 5 (Inductive): Quoted swans example → narrative "After observing one
  hundred white swans... until a black swan is discovered"

API cost: ~$0.30, duration 12s, 0 errors, 0 quota issues.
Field scope verified: only `remark_en` edited (3 EN fields available); 0
edits on title_en/description_en/other-langs/FR.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant