Ignore latest (irrelevant) CVE alert - #945
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 46 minutes and 5 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR adds a Trivy security ignore entry for vulnerability CVE-2026-45447 (affecting libcrypto3/libssl3), documented as not exploitable with an expiration date of 2026-06-18 for future re-evaluation. ChangesSecurity vulnerability ignore configuration
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.trivyignore.yaml:
- Around line 2-4: Update the Trivy ignore entry for id CVE-2026-45447 by
renaming the field "expires" to "expired_at" so Trivy's structured ignore schema
will honor the 1-week re-evaluation; keep the rationale text referencing
PKCS7_verify as-is (confirming there are no PKCS7_verify / PKCS7_* / pkcs7
references in the repo) and ensure the entry still includes the same date value
for expired_at.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
|



Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores