Pipeline codes in code schemes

[as2388]

Code schemes also need entries in each code for which cleaning codes they match to

(Related to #149)

[lukechurch]

@as2388 Do you have a sample scheme that you would like me to demo this on?

[as2388]

Can we prioritise the gender scheme for ReDSS? (Once that’s done I will be unblocked on generating schemes for the other variables on that project)

…

On 26 Nov 2018, at 10:55, Luke Church ***@***.***> wrote: @as2388 <https://github.com/as2388> Do you have a sample scheme that you would like me to demo this on? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#150 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHmD2MZ6auwmHc_1HU4y0Pojq6s7KTBEks5uy8iQgaJpZM4Ywx3j>.

[lukechurch]

#158

[lukechurch]

Yup - what do the cleaners give? male/female? m/f?

[as2388]

Codes.MALE (“male”)/Codes.FEMALE (“female”)