[Snyk] Security upgrade pillow from 9.5.0 to 10.2.0

[AdamOswald]

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

• Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
  • requirements/_requirements_base.txt

⚠️ Warning

scikit-learn 1.0.2 requires scipy, which is not installed.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:

Severity	Priority Score (*)	Issue	Upgrade	Breaking Change	Exploit Maturity
	843/1000 Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 9	Eval Injection SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-6182918	pillow: 9.5.0 -> 10.2.0	No	Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Eval Injection

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Updated the Pillow package to enhance image processing capabilities.

[aviator-app]

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This pull request is currently open (not queued).

How to merge

To merge this PR, comment /aviator merge or add the mergequeue label.

---

See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.

Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

[performance-testing-bot]

Unable to verify url with installation ID

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.txt : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[senior-dev-bot]

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. 🎉 To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization AdamOswald. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. 🚀

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The overarching modification entails upgrading the Pillow library across various projects to rectify a high-severity Denial of Service vulnerability (CVE-2023-44271). The update shifts from versions prior to 10.0.0 to a more secure version 10.0.0 or above, enhancing the stability and security of the projects.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
requirements/_requirements_base.txt	Upgraded pillow from 9.2.0 to 10.2.0

Related issues

• Pillow-9.4.0-cp37-cp37m-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl: 2 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 8.1) finetuned_diffusion#11: This PR potentially resolves the vulnerability issue by upgrading Pillow as suggested.
• Pillow-9.5.0-cp37-cp37m-manylinux_2_28_x86_64.whl: 2 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 8.1) #339: The PR addresses the upgrade of Pillow to mitigate the CVE-2023-44271 vulnerability.
• Pillow-9.3.0-cp37-cp37m-manylinux_2_28_x86_64.whl: 2 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 8.1) #340: The objectives of addressing the Pillow vulnerability and ensuring compatibility are likely met by this PR.
• Pillow-9.4.0-cp37-cp37m-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl: 2 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 8.1) FT#13: This PR seems to resolve the high-severity vulnerability by upgrading Pillow to the recommended version.
• Pillow-9.3.0-cp37-cp37m-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl: 2 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 8.1) Huggingface-Space#95: The PR appears to address the Denial of Service risk by upgrading Pillow to version 10.0.0.

Poem

In the code where bugs do creep,
A rabbit hopped, no time to sleep.
With a fix in hand, so bold and neat,
🐇💻 Pillow upgraded, no more defeat.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[difflens]

View changes in DiffLens

[sourcery-ai]

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: The pull request addresses a critical security vulnerability by upgrading the Pillow library from version 9.5.0 to 10.2.0. This upgrade mitigates the risk associated with an Eval Injection vulnerability that has been identified by Snyk.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.

• Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.

✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.

No details provided.

📝 Complexity: the changes are too large or complex for Sourcery to approve.

• Unsupported files: the diff contains files that Sourcery does not currently support during reviews.

General suggestions:

• Ensure that the upgrade to Pillow 10.2.0 does not introduce any compatibility issues with other parts of the project.
• Verify that all functionalities that rely on Pillow are still working as expected after the upgrade.
• Consider reviewing other dependencies for potential vulnerabilities to maintain the security posture of the project.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

---

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

[guide-bot]

Thanks for opening this Pull Request!
We need you to:

1. Fill out the description.

   Action: Edit description and replace <!- ... --> with actual values.

[difflens]

View changes in DiffLens

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cddd9f and 6c610ad.

Files selected for processing (1)

• requirements/_requirements_base.txt (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 2

requirements/_requirements_base.txt (2)

• 5-5: The update of the pillow package from version 9.2.0 to 10.2.0 is correct and aligns with the PR's objective to mitigate the identified security vulnerability.
• 6-7: The PR notes a warning about scikit-learn requiring scipy, which is not installed. This file does not include scipy, which could lead to issues if scikit-learn is indeed dependent on it. Verify if scipy needs to be added to the requirements.

[secure-code-warrior-for-github]

Micro-Learning Topic: Denial of service (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Denial of Service"

The Denial of Service (DoS) attack is focused on making a resource (site, application, server) unavailable for the purpose it was designed. There are many ways to make a service unavailable for legitimate users by manipulating network packets, programming, logical, or resources handling vulnerabilities, among others. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Denial_of_Service

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior