forked from Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
research: AceHack/LFG cost-parity audit (Otto-61/62 directive) #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
208 changes: 208 additions & 0 deletions
208
docs/research/acehack-lfg-cost-parity-audit-2026-04-23.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ | ||
| # AceHack vs LFG cost-parity audit | ||
|
|
||
| **Date:** 2026-04-23 | ||
| **Status:** first-pass audit; `admin:org` scope elevation authorized but not yet applied | ||
| **Lives on:** AceHack (experimentation-frontier per Amara authority-axis split — Otto-61 memory) | ||
| **Companion memory (per-user, pending in-repo migration):** | ||
| `feedback_lfg_free_actions_credits_limited_acehack_is_poor_man_host_big_batches_to_lfg_not_one_for_one_2026_04_23.md` | ||
| **Triggering directive:** human-maintainer Otto-61 — *"we should parity | ||
| check for costs and see if there is really anyting AceHack gets us | ||
| for free that would limit us on LFG"*. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## TL;DR | ||
|
|
||
| - **Linux Actions**: both repos public → both unlimited-free. Parity. | ||
| - **macOS-14 runner**: already cost-aware — `gate.yml` matrix runs it | ||
| only on AceHack. Keep. | ||
| - **LFG monthly baseline cost** (confirmed by human-maintainer | ||
| Otto-62, with follow-up Otto-62 correction *"i only used one user | ||
| seat so only 19, maybe will update max later"*): Team plan | ||
| (~$4/seat × 2 = $8/mo) + **Copilot Business** (~$19 × 1 seat | ||
| active = $19/mo; may scale later) ≈ **~$27/mo flat** before any | ||
| per-Actions spend. | ||
| - **AceHack as user account**: exact Copilot-Pro status requires | ||
| human-maintainer billing page (not exposed to the agent read-only | ||
| API). If Aaron holds Copilot Pro personally, AceHack inherits | ||
| Copilot PR reviews + Chat. If not, AceHack has no Copilot. | ||
| - **Conclusion**: LFG is richer (Team plan + Copilot Business); AceHack | ||
| is cheaper. Amara's authority-axis split (experiments → AceHack; | ||
| decisions → LFG) stands. The cost delta is real but not a | ||
| constraint against "go wild" on public-repo Actions minutes. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Observable from agent read-only API | ||
|
|
||
| ### Repo visibility + ownership | ||
|
|
||
| | Field | LFG | AceHack | | ||
| |---|---|---| | ||
| | `visibility` | public | public | | ||
| | `owner.type` | Organization | User | | ||
| | `fork` | false | **true** (fork of LFG) | | ||
| | default branch | main | main | | ||
|
|
||
| ### Security + analysis features | ||
|
|
||
| | Feature | LFG | AceHack | | ||
| |---|---|---| | ||
| | `dependabot_security_updates` | enabled | disabled — could be enabled free on public repos | | ||
| | `secret_scanning` | enabled | enabled | | ||
| | `secret_scanning_push_protection` | enabled | enabled | | ||
| | `secret_scanning_ai_detection` | disabled (paid) | not exposed (disabled) | | ||
| | `secret_scanning_validity_checks` | disabled (paid) | disabled | | ||
| | `secret_scanning_delegated_alert_dismissal` | disabled (paid) | not exposed | | ||
| | `secret_scanning_delegated_bypass` | disabled (paid) | not exposed | | ||
| | `secret_scanning_non_provider_patterns` | disabled | disabled | | ||
|
|
||
| ### Actions runner cost-awareness (`gate.yml`) | ||
|
|
||
| ```yaml | ||
| os: ${{ fromJSON(github.repository == 'Lucent-Financial-Group/Zeta' | ||
| && '["ubuntu-22.04"]' | ||
| || '["ubuntu-22.04","macos-14"]') }} | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Deliberate cost split: macOS-14 (10x multiplier even on public repos) | ||
| runs on AceHack only. LFG is Linux-only. This predates the Otto-61 | ||
| directive chain; recognising it as already-correct. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Workflow run history (snapshot 2026-04-23) | ||
|
|
||
| - LFG: ~30 recent workflow runs (paginated API; actual total may be | ||
| higher) | ||
| - AceHack: not queried this pass | ||
| - Artifact storage (LFG): 0 artifacts | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Unobservable without scope elevation | ||
|
|
||
| Needs `admin:org` on Lucent-Financial-Group (human-maintainer | ||
| authorized 2026-04-23 Otto-62: *"you can have admin:org and whatever | ||
| you need"*): | ||
|
|
||
| - Actual Actions minute consumption + spend-to-date | ||
| - Copilot seat allocation (human-maintainer confirmed | ||
| Otto-62: *"i pay for copilot business i think on LFG"*) | ||
| - Per-seat license state | ||
| - Billing invoices + projected monthly total | ||
|
|
||
| Needs human-maintainer's personal billing page: | ||
|
|
||
| - AceHack user account plan tier (Free / Pro / Pro+) | ||
| - Personal Copilot Pro subscription status | ||
| - Personal Actions minute quotas (private-repo only; public is free | ||
| regardless) | ||
|
|
||
| **Operational path:** elevate `gh auth` scope interactively via | ||
| `gh auth refresh -h github.com -s admin:org` when the agent + human | ||
| are together in the same session. Second pass on this audit consumes | ||
| the elevated scope to fill the unobservable fields. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Confirmed cost structure (from human-maintainer Otto-62) | ||
|
|
||
| ### LFG (Organization, Team plan) | ||
|
|
||
| | Line | Monthly | Notes | | ||
| |---|---:|---| | ||
| | Team plan base | ~$8 | $4/seat × 2 seats filled | | ||
| | Copilot Business | ~$19 | $19 × 1 seat active (human-maintainer Otto-62 correction: only 1 seat in use, may scale later) | | ||
| | Advanced Security paid features | $0 | None currently enabled (ai_detection, validity, delegated_bypass all disabled) | | ||
| | Actions (Linux on public repos) | $0 | Free unlimited | | ||
| | Actions (macOS) | $0 | Avoided via gate.yml matrix | | ||
| | **LFG baseline** | **~$27/mo** | **flat before Actions usage** (= $8 Team + $19 Copilot × 1 seat) | | ||
|
|
||
| ### AceHack (User account, fork of LFG) | ||
|
|
||
| | Line | Monthly | Notes | | ||
| |---|---:|---| | ||
| | User account base | $0 — needs human-maintainer confirmation if Copilot Pro held personally | public-repo hosting is free | | ||
| | Actions (Linux on public repos) | $0 | Free unlimited | | ||
| | Actions (macOS-14) | ?? | Multiplier applies; personal-account free-minute quota for public repos needs verification | | ||
| | Advanced features | $0 | None visible | | ||
| | **AceHack baseline** | **~$0-$10/mo** | **depending on human-maintainer's personal plan** | | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## What AceHack gets free that LFG does NOT | ||
|
|
||
| **Short answer:** on current visible evidence, **nothing material**. | ||
|
|
||
| - Copilot PR reviews: if human-maintainer has Copilot Pro personally, | ||
| AceHack gets them free; LFG has Copilot Business (confirmed paid). | ||
| If AceHack is on personal Pro and LFG is on Business, they're | ||
| **both** getting Copilot, just through different billing paths. | ||
| - Linux Actions: parity (both free). | ||
| - macOS Actions: AceHack accepts the cost (per gate.yml); LFG | ||
| deliberately avoids. **LFG has better cost discipline here.** | ||
| - Dependabot security updates: LFG has it enabled; AceHack has it | ||
| disabled (could be enabled free — suggested). | ||
| - Secret scanning + push protection: parity. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## What LFG gets that AceHack does NOT | ||
|
|
||
| - Dependabot security updates (LFG-only, by current config) | ||
| - Copilot Business reviewer (confirmed paid, $19/mo for 1 seat; may scale up later) | ||
| - Organizational governance (Team plan) | ||
| - Operationally-canonical authority (per Amara PR #219 absorb) | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Recommendations | ||
|
|
||
| ### Short-term (this session) | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Don't pivot away from LFG for active per-PR work.** Public-repo | ||
| Actions are free; the Copilot Business cost is a flat monthly | ||
| fee, not per-PR. Extra PRs don't increase cost. | ||
| 2. **Keep the `gate.yml` macOS split.** It works; it's the real | ||
| cost-avoidance layer. | ||
| 3. **Apply the Amara authority-axis split** (experiments → AceHack, | ||
| decisions → LFG) as the semantic driver — not cost. This | ||
| research doc lives on AceHack per that rule (it's experimental | ||
| measurement tooling). | ||
|
|
||
| ### Medium-term (BACKLOG candidates) | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Parity-audit tool** — shell + `gh api` pulls that emit a | ||
| per-month audit doc like this one, tracking deltas over time. | ||
| S effort. File against AceHack as experimentation. | ||
| 2. **Elevate `gh auth` with `admin:org`** next time the agent + | ||
| human are together in a synchronous session. Complete the | ||
| billing-side of this audit. | ||
| 3. **Enable dependabot_security_updates on AceHack** (free, | ||
| increases parity). One-click through repo settings. | ||
| 4. **Document the LFG baseline $46/mo** in an ADR so future Otto | ||
| sessions can cost-account with numbers, not speculation. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Long-term (if cost becomes binding) | ||
|
|
||
| 1. If LFG costs approach Aaron's budget ceiling, consider | ||
| Copilot-only-on-AceHack mirror-PR workflow: author on AceHack | ||
| (uses personal Copilot Pro if present), cherry-pick to LFG | ||
| periodically. Preserves decision-canon on LFG while shifting | ||
| review-cost to personal subscription. | ||
| 2. If Copilot PR reviews stop being useful vs cost, drop Copilot | ||
| Business and rely on Codex (external, chatgpt-codex-connector) | ||
| for PR review. Codex is separate billing (Amara's ChatGPT-based | ||
| subscription). Not comparable. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Attribution | ||
|
|
||
| Human maintainer authorized admin:org scope elevation + confirmed | ||
| Copilot Business paid on LFG. Otto (loop-agent PM hat, Otto-62) | ||
| authored this doc. Amara's authority-axis split (PR #219 absorb) | ||
| drove the semantic framing. Otto-61 per-user memory seeded the | ||
| observations; this doc is the first in-repo Overlay-A mirror of | ||
| that memory's findings. Future-session Otto with admin:org scope | ||
| fills in the billing-side unobservables + lands a second-pass | ||
| audit as an updated row under `docs/research/`. | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The document consistently derives the LFG baseline as
~$27/mo(Team$8+ Copilot Business$19), but this recommendation asks to document$46/mo, which contradicts the rest of the audit and would propagate an incorrect cost baseline into any follow-up ADR or budgeting decisions.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.