You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed that, for every eigen type, one has to reimplement class get_matrix3d. This seems error prone and tedious. For example, if we want to support transformation of 4x1 types (see #30), we will have to also implement class get_matrix4d in every type. Then if we want to support native dynamic matrices (see #29), we would have to implement something similar in every derived rotation type as well.
Can we find a simpler way that only needs one implementation per linear algebra package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've noticed that, for every eigen type, one has to reimplement
class get_matrix3d
. This seems error prone and tedious. For example, if we want to support transformation of4x1
types (see #30), we will have to also implementclass get_matrix4d
in every type. Then if we want to support native dynamic matrices (see #29), we would have to implement something similar in every derived rotation type as well.Can we find a simpler way that only needs one implementation per linear algebra package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: