Drop preview image fallback#2342
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR refactors IPFS URL resolution in drop-related components and helpers, replacing Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 53 minutes and 30 seconds.Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@__tests__/components/waves/drop/WaveDropAdditionalInfo.test.tsx`:
- Around line 10-16: The test currently asserts a mock-only DOM attribute
data-fallback-src produced by the mocked FallbackImage, which doesn't exist in
production; update WaveDropAdditionalInfo.test.tsx to stop asserting
data-fallback-src and instead assert that the mocked FallbackImage received the
expected fallbackSrc prop (e.g., by checking the props passed to the
FallbackImage mock or using Jest's toHaveBeenCalledWith/props inspection for the
FallbackImage mock component) so the test verifies the prop contract rather than
a mock-specific rendered attribute.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 626fcc67-007e-4144-bde3-afe78abcd23b
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
__tests__/components/waves/drop/WaveDropAdditionalInfo.test.tsx__tests__/helpers/waves/drop.helpers.test.tscomponents/waves/drop/WaveDropAdditionalInfo.tsxhelpers/waves/drop.helpers.ts
|



Summary by CodeRabbit