Mint Phases time fix + marketplaces

[prxt6529]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Marketplace links now display dynamically based on contract type, improving relevance for users.
  • Phase generation timing reference updated to prioritize claim start date for more accurate calculations.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4ce9e46a-ef26-4709-8bfe-3d1c00a9a5cf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 92e2a61 and 24d71eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• components/manifold-minting/ManifoldMinting.tsx
• components/nft-marketplace-links/NFTMarketplaceLinks.tsx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two components were refactored: ManifoldMinting.tsx now anchors phase calculations to claim.startDate instead of mint_date when available, and NFTMarketplaceLinks.tsx replaces hard-coded marketplace link JSX with a data-driven MARKETPLACES constant structure supporting dynamic visibility filtering.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Phase Anchoring Logic components/manifold-minting/ManifoldMinting.tsx	Modified phase calculation to use claim.startDate as anchor date when available (startDate > 0), otherwise falls back to mint_date, changing the timing reference for phase generation.
Marketplace Links Refactoring components/nft-marketplace-links/NFTMarketplaceLinks.tsx	Introduced typed MarketplaceLink structure and MARKETPLACES constant to drive marketplace data; replaced hard-coded individual marketplace link JSX blocks with data-driven map rendering; added shouldShow conditional visibility logic for Blur marketplace.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• #1579: Refactors phase construction/usage to compute phases per-call using startDate, directly complementing the anchor date change in ManifoldMinting.tsx.

Suggested reviewers

• simo6529
• ragnep

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through linked marketplaces so grand,
With data-driven structure, each link now planned,
And phases that dance to a claim's starting beat,
No more hard-coded chaos—just clean, neat!
✨🔗

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly corresponds to the two main changes: fixing mint phase timing logic and refactoring marketplace links to be data-driven.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch mint-phase-marketplaces

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud