This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 12, 2021. It is now read-only.
Merged
Conversation
zachmargolis
requested review from
achapm,
jmhooper,
mitchellhenke and
stevegsa
jmhooper
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2021
zachmargolis
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2021
This reverts commit dd16ec9.
zachmargolis
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feedback from LN was that we were sending the whole DOB, this logging will tell me if the correct branch is being hit
I thought maybe about logging the payload, since it's "just" the year of birth, but that seemed risky
Next steps: