-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
LG-11128: Allow skip to account #9410
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
mdiarra3
merged 12 commits into
main
from
LG-11128-skip-to-account-page-in-person-proofing
Oct 24, 2023
+9
−1
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9b739d9
changelog: User-Facing Improvements, Authentication, In person proofi…
mdiarra3 bb9144d
remove account path check
mdiarra3 5a7d7ae
remove return
mdiarra3 7a55d5f
skip when in pending profile
mdiarra3 cba38fe
in person spec, fix verify profile concern fix
mdiarra3 7ba9609
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into LG-11128-skip-to-acco…
mdiarra3 17a0a3e
update spec
mdiarra3 ba4fe96
in personccccccnucjfbjecbfguhbrdfbtvlvidgibetckftjthu
mdiarra3 0b8b89a
update spec
mdiarra3 c438f42
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into LG-11128-skip-to-acco…
mdiarra3 e5aa1de
sign in user
mdiarra3 e0f002d
also 2fa
mdiarra3 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mdiarra3 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
url_for_pending_profile_reasonalso redirects for profiles that havefraud_review_pendingorfraud_rejectionstatus. I think we should change the behavior of that method, not remove it here. And add feature specs that confirm that users are redirected as expected - I'm surprised nothing failed.I was going to run the in_person feature spec to get a look at idv_in_person_ready_to_verify_url and see if the user would still need to be able to get there, but my local setup won't run feature specs suddenly :-(. Do we have a banner on the account page to allow the user to access that page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@soniaconnolly Does the discussion at #9410 (comment) help contextualize the reason for the change? My fear with modifying
url_for_pending_profile_reasonis that method is used elsewhere likeIdvControllerwhere we'd want the fraud review and fraud rejection screens to be shown, but we don't want those to be shown when signing in at IAL1.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see. That makes more sense, thanks.