Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this have been implemented in
Pii::Attributes.new_from_jsonto avoid double-parsing, and since we already have at least one check there already?Here:
identity-idp/app/services/pii/attributes.rb
Lines 22 to 24 in daf7265
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It could, yeah
The competing factor is this is so far only known to affect recovery PII, and Pii::Attributes is used in more places and this is a quicker fix, so I opted towards the smaller scope, though it should definitely be given a fuller consideration in the follow-up work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we have done a truthiness check? in case the value was a literal
false?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think for the specific case here the problem value is
nil, but we could expand it to be anything that is not a Hash since that's really the only valid type (and we could also validate that it has the expected keys, etc. if we wanted as well)