-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
log when resolution and address proofing are throttled (LG-4430) #4858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ def index | |
| elsif active_profile? && !liveness_upgrade_required? | ||
| redirect_to idv_activated_url | ||
| elsif idv_attempter_throttled? | ||
| analytics.track_event( | ||
| Analytics::THROTTLER_RATE_LIMIT_TRIGGERED, | ||
| throttle_type: :idv_resolution, | ||
| ) | ||
|
Comment on lines
+15
to
+18
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it intentional to omit the
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This check happens before a step or anything is reached, so |
||
| redirect_to idv_fail_url | ||
| elsif sp_over_quota_limit? | ||
| flash[:error] = t('errors.doc_auth.quota_reached') | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure it's in the AC but how about logic to only log it once when the limit is reached? (vs on every retry)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On second thought we can just query distinct. Probably better to log it.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Flip flopping again. Def better to know if they hit the limit separately (and only once for the window). Hitting the limit, waiting the window and getting throttled again should be separate from 2 tries when throttled in one window.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have a good way to only log once unfortunately. We initially had the event fire when the throttler incremented to be on the final attempt, but since it's possible for the final attempt to succeed that wasn't a great way to capture that someone was throttled. We typically only have throttler checks at the beginning of an action, which means it can happen multiple times :/
For reference, this builds on work from #4829
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could have two separate events or one event and a boolean which indicates they are retrying and still throttled
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"We don't have a good way to only log once unfortunately." - We'd have to keep incrementing the throttle and do a check but that's a big change. I'll go ahead and approve