Skip to content

Updates User Flows tools#1481

Merged
amoose merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
amos-feature-user_flows_enhance
Jun 9, 2017
Merged

Updates User Flows tools#1481
amoose merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
amos-feature-user_flows_enhance

Conversation

@amoose
Copy link
Contributor

@amoose amoose commented Jun 7, 2017

Why

  • To provide better insight in to our UX

How

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we hit the line length limit if we use a ternary?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: capitalization. UserFlowExporter (lowercase 'L')

@zachmargolis
Copy link
Contributor

We don't run this in CI because it's slow, right? Would it be a reasonable up if we stubbed out the "save_and_screenshot" part? That way we can make sure we don't break these accidentally?

@amoose
Copy link
Contributor Author

amoose commented Jun 8, 2017

Yes, because they're slow and the additional burden on devs. I think that's a reasonable exploration.

Copy link
Contributor

@zachmargolis zachmargolis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! verified locally that the flows generate stuff (didn't test the uploading)

@amoose
Copy link
Contributor Author

amoose commented Jun 9, 2017

Thanks for review, Zach. Rebasin' and mergin' 📯

Adds web export task (compatible with Federalist)
Expands specs to cover new mail activation flow
Relaxes style constraints for User Flows tool
@amoose amoose force-pushed the amos-feature-user_flows_enhance branch from 68ea3a3 to 2aa930c Compare June 9, 2017 17:46
@amoose amoose merged commit 77c3eee into master Jun 9, 2017
@amoose amoose deleted the amos-feature-user_flows_enhance branch June 9, 2017 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants