[proof] Docs-only PR check plan skip

[100yenadmin]

Proof PR for #374 after #455 merged. Expected PR Check Plan: run_package_smoke=false and run_windows_checks=false, with Thin App Smoke and Windows unit tests skipped. This PR is intended for CI proof and can be closed after evidence is captured.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a note clarifying that documentation-only updates should not trigger the Workbench package smoke check.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a9743fd1-c390-4836-a9dc-e96ffe4a0d68

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6861094 and a9e390b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/evaos/public-beta-packaging-rollback.md

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (3)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality
• GitHub Check: Unit Tests (macos-14)
• GitHub Check: Coverage Test

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/evaos/public-beta-packaging-rollback.md (1)

5-6: LGTM!

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a note to the public beta packaging rollback doc stating that docs-only PRs should not run the Workbench package smoke workflow.

Changes

Docs-only CI note

Layer / File(s)	Summary
CI proof note docs/evaos/public-beta-packaging-rollback.md	Adds a note that docs-only PRs must not trigger the Workbench package smoke workflow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• 100yenadmin/evaOS-GUI#455: Updates the workflow logic that gates run_package_smoke, which matches the behavior referenced by this documentation note.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description states the intent, but it omits the required template sections like Related Issues, Type of Change, and Testing.	Rewrite the PR body using the repository template and fill in Description, Related Issues, Type of Change, Testing, Screenshots, and Additional Context.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly indicates this is a docs-only PR proof to skip the package check plan.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/workbench-pr-check-docs-proof-374

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[100yenadmin]

Proof captured for #374: PR Checks run 28285285615 used the trusted base planner and emitted run_windows_checks=false, windows_reasons_json=[], run_package_smoke=false, package_smoke_reasons_json=[]. The Unit Tests (windows-2022) and Thin App Smoke (macos-arm64) jobs were skipped as expected for this docs-only change. Closing this proof PR unmerged.