Failing geth integration tests

[Raneet10]

This PR un-skips a geth integration test and also fixes a minor bug encountered while running the tests. Initially, this PR was meant to trigger CI by "un-skipping" failing integration tests and verify whether these are related to Bor's implementation.

Ref: https://polygon.atlassian.net/browse/POS-618

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 56.84% // Head: 56.82% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (2db0dc8) compared to base (2a677a5).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #521      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.84%   56.82%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          607      607              
  Lines        69993    69996       +3     
===========================================
- Hits         39786    39778       -8     
+ Misses       26801    26798       -3     
- Partials      3406     3420      +14     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
core/state_transition.go	89.10% <ø> (ø)
les/distributor.go	79.68% <0.00%> (-3.13%)	⬇️
rlp/typecache.go	89.53% <0.00%> (-2.33%)	⬇️
les/utils/limiter.go	90.55% <0.00%> (-1.67%)	⬇️
les/vflux/client/serverpool.go	76.76% <0.00%> (-1.66%)	⬇️
consensus/ethash/ethash.go	53.05% <0.00%> (-1.15%)	⬇️
internal/cli/flagset/flagset.go	35.77% <0.00%> (-1.02%)	⬇️
p2p/message.go	51.78% <0.00%> (-0.90%)	⬇️
trie/trie.go	75.73% <0.00%> (-0.74%)	⬇️
eth/filters/api.go	41.13% <0.00%> (-0.71%)	⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.