Skip to content

Conversation

@sean-zlai
Copy link
Contributor

@sean-zlai sean-zlai commented Dec 18, 2024

Summary

Scope all the Github workflow trigger paths regarding workflows to self to not unnecessarily trigger all the other workflows.

image

See Slack thread

Checklist

  • Added Unit Tests
  • Covered by existing CI
  • Integration tested
  • Documentation update

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refining GitHub Actions workflow trigger paths across multiple workflow files. Specifically, the changes modify the .github/workflows/ files to narrow down workflow triggers to only activate when their respective YAML files are directly modified, instead of triggering on any change within the workflows directory. This adjustment applies to test_python.yaml, test_scala_fmt.yaml, test_scala_no_spark.yaml, and test_scala_spark.yaml files, ensuring more precise workflow activation conditions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/test_python.yaml Workflow trigger paths updated from .github/workflows/** to .github/workflows/test_python.yaml
.github/workflows/test_scala_fmt.yaml Workflow trigger paths updated for both push and pull_request events from .github/workflows/** to .github/workflows/test_scala_fmt.yaml
.github/workflows/test_scala_no_spark.yaml Workflow trigger paths narrowed to only include test_scala_no_spark.yaml
.github/workflows/test_scala_spark.yaml Workflow trigger paths refined to specifically trigger on test_scala_spark.yaml modifications

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • nikhil-zlai
  • piyush-zlai

Poem

🐰 Workflows dancing, paths refined,
Triggers now precise, carefully designed.
No more broad sweeps across the land,
Each YAML file now takes a stand!
GitHub Actions, lean and bright,
Triggered just when changes ignite! 🔧


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sean-zlai sean-zlai requested a review from tchow-zlai December 18, 2024 22:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e127fb7 and e301c88.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/test_python.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test_scala_fmt.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test_scala_no_spark.yaml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test_scala_spark.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/test_python.yaml
  • .github/workflows/test_scala_fmt.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test_scala_spark.yaml (1)

9-9: LGTM! Path scoping changes look correct.

The addition of .github/workflows/test_scala_spark.yaml to the trigger paths ensures the workflow runs when modified while maintaining the existing Spark-related triggers. This change aligns with the PR objective of scoping workflow paths to self.

Let's verify that all Spark-related paths are included:

Also applies to: 16-16

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the paths in the workflow file against the discovered Spark-related files.


Paths configuration is complete and accurate

The current path triggers in the workflow file:

  • spark/**: Covers all Spark-related source files and tests found in the repository
  • build.sbt: Captures any Scala/SBT build configuration changes
  • .github/workflows/test_scala_spark.yaml: Self-referential for workflow changes

This matches perfectly with the discovered files from our verification, as all Spark-related files are under the spark/ directory, and the build configuration is covered by build.sbt. No additional paths need to be included.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all Spark-related paths in the repository
# to ensure we haven't missed any important triggers

# Find all Spark-related source files and configurations
fd . spark/ -t f | grep -v '/target/' | sort | uniq

Length of output: 6576


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the current paths configuration from the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/test_scala_spark.yaml

Length of output: 3225

- 'online/**'
- 'api/**'
- '.github/workflows/**'
- '.github/workflows/test_scala_no_spark.yaml'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Workflow paths need to be updated to include missing Scala modules

The current workflow paths are missing several Scala modules that are being tested in the jobs section:

  • hub/** is missing but has hub tests being run
  • service/** is missing but has service tests being run

Additionally, there are other Scala modules in the codebase that might need consideration:

  • cloud_aws/**
  • cloud_gcp/**
  • quickstart/mongo-online-impl/**
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Path scoping changes look correct.

The addition of .github/workflows/test_scala_no_spark.yaml to the trigger paths ensures the workflow runs when modified while maintaining the existing Scala-related triggers. This change aligns with the PR objective of scoping workflow paths to self.

Let's verify that all relevant Scala paths are included:

Also applies to: 22-22


Let me verify the paths in the workflow file against the Scala files found in the repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all Scala-related paths in the repository
# to ensure we haven't missed any important triggers

# Find all Scala source files
fd -e scala -e sbt . | grep -v '/target/' | sort | uniq

Length of output: 17065


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the current paths in the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/test_scala_no_spark.yaml

Length of output: 1639

@sean-zlai sean-zlai merged commit 2b7efd8 into main Dec 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@sean-zlai sean-zlai deleted the sean/workflow-paths branch December 19, 2024 01:10
This was referenced Dec 22, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025
4 tasks
kumar-zlai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
## Summary

Scope all the Github workflow trigger paths regarding workflows to self
to not unnecessarily trigger all the other workflows.


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ee6099a-085a-4ac4-8472-108346c0f4f3)

See Slack
[thread](https://zipline-2kh4520.slack.com/archives/C072LUA50KA/p1734555635936189)

## Checklist
- [ ] Added Unit Tests
- [ ] Covered by existing CI
- [ ] Integration tested
- [ ] Documentation update


<!-- av pr metadata
This information is embedded by the av CLI when creating PRs to track
the status of stacks when using Aviator. Please do not delete or edit
this section of the PR.
```
{"parent":"main","parentHead":"","trunk":"main"}
```
-->

Co-authored-by: Sean Lynch <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants