Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make sure auth()'s type is properly resolved #65

Closed
ymc9 opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Make sure auth()'s type is properly resolved #65

ymc9 opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Milestone
v0.4.0

Comments

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

ymc9 commented Nov 8, 2022

Currently, result type of auth() function is weakly resolved because it needs to refer to the User model defined by user. We should actually let it resolve to the user-defined User model.
@ymc9 ymc9 added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 8, 2022
@ymc9 ymc9 closed this as completed Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ymc9