sneak move is not the same I imagine

[1925381584]

Check for existing issues

• Completed

Describe the bug / provide steps to reproduce it

0b105ba
this PR add sneak motion, thanks for the author of this PR first , but I think it is two-letter version of command f,I think sneak move is like the following git. Of course, it's possible that the version of my understanding is not equivalent to this PR .

Zed Version and System Specs

Zed: v0.170.0 (Zed Dev 0b105ba)
OS: Windows 10.0.19045
Memory: 15.7 GiB
Architecture: x86_64
GPU: Intel(R) Iris(R) Xe Graphics || Intel Corporation || 101.5972

If applicable, add screenshots or screencasts of the incorrect state / behavior

No response

If applicable, attach your Zed.log file to this issue.

Zed.log

[ConradIrwin]

@1925381584 To clarify here - the main thing you'd like is to see the highlighting of the jump targets?

If you'd like to pair with me on this https://cal.com/conradirwin/pairing

[1925381584]

Hi, I may not be able to match you, but I want to express the specific one.
First staring at that letter throughout the entire visible range, and then hit the letter. At this time, all the matched letters will have two temporary letters to indicate its position. Then you enter the two letters you want to go again. At this time, the cursor will jump to that position immediately.The difference between it and the existing sneak move is that it is a full visible range jump and has temporary highlighting. I think the existing sneak move is just a two-letter version of the F command, which can only move by adjacent positions, while moving in the full visible range is very practical in specific scenarios.

[ConradIrwin]

I think the behavior that was implemented matches https://github.com/justinmk/vim-sneak?tab=readme-ov-file#usage; which is not the same as you describe. The plugin you are describing sounds more like EasyMotion (which was also requested, but not implemented yet!)

[1925381584]

yeah, you are right. because I only use emacs before, so I made a mistake about the name in vim

[ConradIrwin]

Ok! Closing for now, but you might want to follow along at #4930