Use greedyMSE for caretEnsemble #306
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe recent updates to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
R/caretEnsemble.R (1)
22-26: Ensure parameter documentation clarity.The description for
excluded_class_idandtuneLengthshould clearly explain their roles and default values. Ensure users understand the impact of these parameters on the function's behavior.man/caretEnsemble.Rd (2)
14-16: Clarify theexcluded_class_idparameter description.The description should clearly state what happens when a class is excluded and the implications for model performance.
18-19: Clarify thetuneLengthparameter description.Ensure users understand how
tuneLengthaffects the tuning process and why the default value is set to 1.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- R/caretEnsemble.R (3 hunks)
- R/caretStack.R (2 hunks)
- R/greedyOpt.R (2 hunks)
- inst/WORDLIST (1 hunks)
- man/caretEnsemble.Rd (2 hunks)
- tests/testthat/test-caretEnsemble.R (3 hunks)
- tests/testthat/test-ensembleMethods.R (1 hunks)
- tests/testthat/test-greedyMSE.R (1 hunks)
- tests/testthat/test-helper_functions.R (1 hunks)
- tests/testthat/test-multiclass.R (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- inst/WORDLIST
- tests/testthat/test-helper_functions.R
- tests/testthat/test-multiclass.R
Additional comments not posted (9)
R/caretEnsemble.R (1)
46-46: Verify the use ofgreedyMSE_caret().The change to use
greedyMSE_caret()should be consistent with the intended improvements in model combination. Ensure this method aligns with the desired outcomes for model stacking.tests/testthat/test-ensembleMethods.R (1)
34-44: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for classifiers.The logic for handling classifiers should be thoroughly tested to ensure accuracy. Verify that the expected output structure is correct for both classifier and non-classifier models.
Verification successful
Comprehensive test coverage for classifiers confirmed.
The test cases for classifiers are well-covered across multiple test files, ensuring that both classifier and non-classifier scenarios are adequately tested. The logic for handling classifiers is thoroughly verified, including validation and error scenarios.
- Files with relevant tests:
tests/testthat/test-ensembleMethods.Rtests/testthat/test-permutationImportance.Rtests/testthat/test-helper_functions.RScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that test cases cover both classifier and non-classifier scenarios. # Test: Search for test cases involving classifiers. Expect: Comprehensive coverage. rg --type r 'isClassifier'Length of output: 4557
R/greedyOpt.R (1)
128-136: Improve clarity in conditional logic for predictions.The nested conditional structure in
predict.greedyMSEimproves clarity by explicitly handling thereturn_labelsparameter. This change ensures that the function behaves predictably based on whether labels are requested. The logic is sound and aligns with the intended functionality.tests/testthat/test-caretEnsemble.R (3)
93-100: Ensure error handling for NA values in predictions.The new test case verifies that the prediction function raises an appropriate error when encountering NA values in the input data. This enhancement improves the robustness of the model by ensuring that non-finite values are handled correctly.
137-137: Increase cross-validation folds for improved evaluation.The number of cross-validation folds in the training control setup has been increased from 2 to 10. This change enhances the robustness of the model evaluation by providing a more thorough assessment of the model's performance.
166-170: Tighten prediction tolerance for stricter accuracy.The tolerance for comparing stacked predictions against in-sample predictions has been tightened from 0.2 to 0.1. Additionally, the expected values for one-row predictions have been adjusted. These changes reflect a refinement in the expected outcomes and indicate a shift towards stricter accuracy requirements.
tests/testthat/test-greedyMSE.R (1)
217-218: Update expected prediction output type to numeric.The test now expects the prediction output to be of type "numeric" and verifies that its length matches the number of rows in the input data frame. This change aligns with the updated model's output structure and ensures consistency in the prediction results.
R/caretStack.R (2)
491-492: Use ofcaret::varImpfor Variable Importance is Appropriate.The change to use
caret::varImpfor obtaining variable importance enhances interpretability by focusing on predictor significance rather than raw coefficients.
554-554: Review Plot Layout Adjustment.The change in plot layout from
g1 + g2 / (g3 + g4) / (g5 + g6)to(g1 + g2) / (g3 + g4) / (g5 + g6)modifies the order of operations, potentially affecting the visual composition. Ensure this aligns with the intended presentation.Verification successful
Review Plot Layout Adjustment Verified
The change in plot layout from
g1 + g2 / (g3 + g4) / (g5 + g6)to(g1 + g2) / (g3 + g4) / (g5 + g6)creates a more structured grid layout, likely improving the visual composition and separation of plot elements. This adjustment appears to be intentional and appropriate for the intended presentation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of plot layout changes in `autoplot.caretStack`. # Test: Search for usage of `autoplot.caretStack` to understand its context and verify if the new layout is appropriate. rg --type r 'autoplot.caretStack'Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation and usage examples of `autoplot.caretStack` to determine the intended plot layout. rg --type r 'autoplot.caretStack' -A 10 # Search for any test files or scripts that might use `autoplot.caretStack` to see how it is being used. fd -e R | xargs rg 'autoplot.caretStack'Length of output: 1359
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definitions of g3, g4, g5, and g6 within the autoplot.caretStack function to understand their roles. rg --type r 'g[3-6] <-' -A 5Length of output: 1540
No description provided.