Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove return_weights #302

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024
Merged

Remove return_weights #302

merged 11 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

zachmayer
Copy link
Owner

@zachmayer zachmayer commented Aug 7, 2024

  • Remove return_weights as an option from predict.caretStack. Use varImp instead.
  • Dramatically simplify logic for predict.caretStack (fewer options helped a lot)
  • Remove randomForest suggests dependencies in tests
  • Test on more platforms, including the earliest officially supported one

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent changes focus on simplifying the caretStack and predict.caretStack functions by removing the return_weights parameter, which streamlines their interfaces and reduces complexity in both the code and associated tests. Documentation has been updated to reflect these changes, and adjustments to coverage metrics indicate a slight decrease in test coverage for several methods. Overall, the modifications enhance the clarity and efficiency of the core functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
R/caretStack.R Removed return_weights parameter from caretStack and predict.caretStack, simplifying function signatures and control flow. Updated logic in predict accordingly.
man/predict.caretStack.Rd Updated documentation by removing return_weights parameter from the function documentation, clarifying the parameter list.
tests/testthat/test-caretEnsemble.R Simplified test cases by eliminating nested loops checking for return_weights, focusing on core prediction functionality without weights.
tests/testthat/test-caretStack.R Updated tests to remove return_weights from predictions, ensuring consistency without weights and simplifying test logic.
cobertura.xml Updated coverage metrics reflecting decreased hits for various methods, indicating a slight reduction in overall test coverage.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3c088c and 15c63c3.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • R/caretStack.R (5 hunks)
  • cobertura.xml (17 hunks)
  • man/predict.caretStack.Rd (2 hunks)
  • tests/testthat/test-caretEnsemble.R (2 hunks)
  • tests/testthat/test-caretStack.R (3 hunks)
  • tests/testthat/test-ensembleMethods.R (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • man/predict.caretStack.Rd
  • tests/testthat/test-caretEnsemble.R
  • tests/testthat/test-ensembleMethods.R
Additional comments not posted (30)
tests/testthat/test-caretStack.R (2)

50-52: Verify the removal of return_weights parameter.

Ensure that the removal of the return_weights parameter does not affect the functionality of the predict function call.

Verification successful

Verification successful: Removal of return_weights parameter

The return_weights parameter is not used in any of the predict function calls across the codebase. The removal of this parameter does not affect the functionality of the predict function calls.

  • No instances of return_weights parameter in predict function calls were found.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `predict` function calls do not use the `return_weights` parameter.

# Test: Search for the `predict` function usage. Expect: No occurrences of `return_weights` parameter.
rg --type r -A 5 $'predict('

Length of output: 96


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `predict` function calls do not use the `return_weights` parameter.

# Test: Search for the `predict` function usage. Expect: No occurrences of `return_weights` parameter.
rg --type r -A 5 $'predict\\('

Length of output: 34226


95-101: Verify the removal of return_weights parameter.

Ensure that the removal of the return_weights parameter does not affect the functionality of the predict function call.

Verification successful

Verified the removal of return_weights parameter.

The return_weights parameter is not used in any predict function calls across the codebase. Therefore, its removal from the test case does not affect the functionality.

  • tests/testthat/test-caretStack.R
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `predict` function calls do not use the `return_weights` parameter.

# Test: Search for the `predict` function usage. Expect: No occurrences of `return_weights` parameter.
rg --type r -A 5 $'predict('

Length of output: 96


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `predict` function calls do not use the `return_weights` parameter.

# Test: Search for the `predict` function usage. Expect: No occurrences of `return_weights` parameter.
rg --type r -A 5 'predict('

Length of output: 96


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `predict` function calls do not use the `return_weights` parameter.

# Test: Search for the `predict` function usage. Expect: No occurrences of `return_weights` parameter.
rg --type r -A 5 'predict\('

Length of output: 34226

R/caretStack.R (2)

461-461: LGTM! The comment provides useful context.

The comment referencing the patchwork package issue provides useful context for future developers.


162-162: Verify the removal of return_weights parameter.

Ensure that the removal of the return_weights parameter does not affect the functionality of the predict.caretStack function.

cobertura.xml (26)

3-3: Verify the impact of reduced coverage metrics.

The lines-covered and lines-valid attributes have decreased from 593 to 591. Ensure that this reduction does not indicate potential issues or missed test cases.


92-92: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 129 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 217. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


93-93: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 132 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 217. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


94-94: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 133 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 217. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


96-96: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 138 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 217. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


97-97: Verify the impact of significantly reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 139 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 96. Ensure that this significant reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


98-98: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 141 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 217. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


99-99: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 142 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


100-100: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 143 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


101-101: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 144 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


102-102: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 145 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


103-103: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 146 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


104-104: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 147 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


105-105: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 154 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


106-106: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 155 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


107-107: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 158 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


108-108: Verify the impact of increased hit counts.

The hit count for line 159 in the predict.caretList method has increased from 250 to 683. Ensure that this increase does not indicate potential issues or missed test cases.


109-109: Verify the impact of increased hit counts.

The hit count for line 160 in the predict.caretList method has increased from 250 to 683. Ensure that this increase does not indicate potential issues or missed test cases.


110-110: Verify the impact of increased hit counts.

The hit count for line 161 in the predict.caretList method has increased from 250 to 683. Ensure that this increase does not indicate potential issues or missed test cases.


111-111: Verify the impact of increased hit counts.

The hit count for line 163 in the predict.caretList method has increased from 250 to 587. Ensure that this increase does not indicate potential issues or missed test cases.


113-113: Verify the impact of increased hit counts.

The hit count for line 168 in the predict.caretList method has increased from 250 to 683. Ensure that this increase does not indicate potential issues or missed test cases.


114-114: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 170 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


115-115: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 173 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


116-116: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 175 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


117-117: Verify the impact of reduced hit counts.

The hit count for line 176 in the predict.caretList method has decreased from 250 to 216. Ensure that this reduction does not affect the method's coverage.


118-118: **Verify the impact of reduced hit

@zachmayer zachmayer changed the title Remove return_weights. use varImp to get model weights instead Remove return_weights as an option from predict.caretStack. Use varImp instead. Aug 7, 2024
@zachmayer zachmayer merged commit bc8d5de into main Aug 7, 2024
12 checks passed
@zachmayer zachmayer deleted the predict branch August 7, 2024 13:37
@zachmayer zachmayer changed the title Remove return_weights as an option from predict.caretStack. Use varImp instead. Remove return_weights Aug 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant