Make devtools\statsd-to-stdout.rb a gem executable

[jar349]

Closes #32

This PR makes the statsd-to-stdout.rb usable by consumers by moving it to a bin/ directory and specifying it as an executable in the gemspec.

Documentation is also updated to indicate how to install and use the binstub.

[yob]

Interesting. I'm not opposed to doing this, but I'm curious - what's the motivation for the change? I considered this script a little utility that's only useful in development, so left it out of the gem.

…

On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 03:14 John Ruiz, ***@***.***> wrote: Closes #32 <#32> This PR makes the statsd-to-stdout.rb usable by consumers by moving it to a bin/ directory and specifying it as an executable in the gemspec. Documentation is also updated to indicate how to install and use the binstub. ------------------------------ You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #33 Commit Summary - make statsd an executable ruby script - bundler documentation says that executables must be in the bindir - forgot to remove devtools from executable gemspec File Changes - *M* README.md <https://github.com/yob/puma-plugin-statsd/pull/33/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5> (12) - *R* bin/statsd-to-stdout <https://github.com/yob/puma-plugin-statsd/pull/33/files#diff-b7f00cbc749d4db221fb59e9d9886180ecc572fb49a750d61a0a5d6a8298f4d8> (1) - *M* puma-plugin-statsd.gemspec <https://github.com/yob/puma-plugin-statsd/pull/33/files#diff-8011364ff3ddfb869187a2202d9cab73e075fd377c4a200b2328d6c23610ff14> (1) Patch Links: - https://github.com/yob/puma-plugin-statsd/pull/33.patch - https://github.com/yob/puma-plugin-statsd/pull/33.diff — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#33>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAB7REQ2JDJSJKE54JDBNDTHM6QJANCNFSM42PERXHQ> .

[yob]

Oh, now that I'm at a computer I've read #32 properly.

I don't think I'd be keen on officially recommending the pattern you've described there, but it's totally a valid thing to do if it works for you! I can't see any downsides to this PR either, so I'm happy to merge it. Thanks!