Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement bytemuck traits for other common types #92

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2023

Conversation

jedjoud10
Copy link
Contributor

Implemented Zeroable and Pod for all Vec<T> types and their variants (simd and repr_c), Mat4<T>s, and for Quaternion

@jedjoud10
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm seems like the CI itself fails. Pretty odd

@yoanlcq
Copy link
Owner

yoanlcq commented Jul 16, 2023

Hey, sorry for the delay, thanks for submitting this PR, it looks good. I have no idea what caused the appveyor failure even after seeing the logs.

What I'm going to do is merge this regardless, compile locally, and if it works I'll push a new version with this change.

@yoanlcq yoanlcq merged commit b5030c6 into yoanlcq:master Jul 16, 2023
yoanlcq added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2023
yoanlcq added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2023
@yoanlcq
Copy link
Owner

yoanlcq commented Jul 16, 2023

Done, available in 0.16.0
Thanks again!

@jedjoud10
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah shoot it doesn't compile with the bytemuck feature. Such simple mistakes as well. Sorry so much about that, I should've tested and not relied on CI.

yoanlcq added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2023
@yoanlcq
Copy link
Owner

yoanlcq commented Jul 17, 2023

No problem, I'll refer #94 from here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants