Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

base model training and ego agent #39

Open
dempsey-wen opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

base model training and ego agent #39

dempsey-wen opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@dempsey-wen
Copy link

Hi Yifan,

It is really inspiring to see that you succeeded to align heterogeneous features with a shared pyramid fusion module.

I have two questions:

  1. I'm wondering whether the base model has to be a lidar model, or we can also start with a camera image model.
  2. Whether the ego can only be lidar or it can also be camera.

I would really appreciate it if you could take the time to answer my questions. :P

@yifanlu0227
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

  1. In my practice, starting with a camera modality as collaboration base is suboptimal to the LiDAR. You could take a look at the open-review forum, where I provided some ablation experiments on it. However, I want to emphasize the worse results may stem from many reasons: the camera detection model is weak / training dataset volume is not enough for camera modality / low image resolution set in the experiments, etc.
  2. It can be camera

@dempsey-wen
Copy link
Author

Thank you for reply. I've found the answers from the review forum.

Again, it is a very solid work, and thank you for your contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants