-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing mention to "rep" in operators list in README #193
Comments
Doing my tests with my extracted grammar I noticed that when the grammar ends with a comment without newline the parser reject it, see the
Output:
Actual hardcoded grammar:
Fixed to handle comments not ending in newline:
|
OBS.: I edited this message with the latest fully working manually extracted grammar and the EBNF. Here is the last extracted grammar, it has trouble parsing
And here converted to the EBNF to be viewed at https://www.bottlecaps.de/rr/ui:
|
One of the problematic rule is this one (that is hardcoded):
When replaced by:
Then it pass parsing I fixed and updated my previous post with the working grammar and EBNF, but still I'm puzzled by this expression |
Again looking carefully I found again my mistake when manually converting this expression So two problems found with this manual conversion of the hardcoded grammar in Thanks for all help ! |
Thanks for the report. I just added |
I'm still trying to extract the
peglib
grammar (why not it's already available?) and found that the operatorrep
used on it is not listed on the README like the others.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: