-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enforce Generator Categorization #768
Comments
Hey @ev1stensberg! Your suggestion isn't clear to me. Could you maybe try to rephrase and provide more specific example? |
In case with webpack-cli, we're trying to categorize generators so that we can show them at our website. If you have something like Did I phrase myself correctly? |
Would it make sense to ask your community to tag their generators with a specific "label" so it makes searching easier? For example, we only search through packages that are named |
we're asking them to tag it |
Summary
It would be convenient to categorize generators at the search page so that library authors can specify specific grammar for their generator names. This way, it's easier for those authors to create ecosystems for their generator based logic.
Why categorization
Categorizing dependencies isn't only good for finding the right generator, but also for authors. Authors have the possibility to have specific namespaces for their generators and this way creates a viable ecosystem for their libraries. Furthermore, specifying categorizes will allow authors to directly link to the generators related to their projects.
Example
babel-generator-react
, first case specifies project, second and third one feature/target ( which is normal convention )The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: