Upstreaming?

[Disasm]

Hi!
Have you considered upstreaming the changes to riscv? I think that VexRiscv-specific registers could live there under the corresponding feature gate.

[xobs]

Yes, that could work.

Originally I forked it to remove symbols we weren't using, in order to reduce binary size. However, with lto, that doesn't seem necessary, so upstreaming makes more sense now.

[Disasm]

I believe this should work even without LTO: all the assembly functions reside in their own sections and Rust already does a great job removing unused code.
Anyway, I'm quite interested in moving the rust-litex-vexriscv ecosystem forward. Unfortunately, I'm working on this in my free time, so my performance is not that great and any help is highly appreciated.

[xobs]

I'll post a deprecation notice once the riscv crate version gets bumped and we can replace "vexriscv" with "riscv" in various projects.

[Disasm]

Published v0.5.6

[xobs]

Thanks!

[phansel]

at this point, does that mean this crate is deprecated?