You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does it make sense / logical to let different dggs(s) implement their decoding method? Or do you have other suggestions on my case?
For my example, there are two possible cases on the input xarray dataset; one is already converted, and the drop_index method works fine; it just re-instantiates the DGGSIndex.
The second one is in 2D ( with x and y coordinates), which I must flatten for conversion. Currently, I am using the stack method as the conversion entry point, like the following :
Heya @keewis ,
Does it make sense / logical to let different dggs(s) implement their decoding method? Or do you have other suggestions on my case?
For my example, there are two possible cases on the input xarray dataset; one is already converted, and the drop_index method works fine; it just re-instantiates the DGGSIndex.
The second one is in 2D ( with x and y coordinates), which I must flatten for conversion. Currently, I am using the stack method as the conversion entry point, like the following :
Thx ~
Happy Holiday ~
Tik
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: