-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Least authority remediation #40
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This reverts commit ecdc09d.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as various corrections and changes go, nothing stands out to me as an issue.
let mut retval = [F::zero(); N]; | ||
retval[0] = F::default(); | ||
Self::new(&retval) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the change here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let a = Fp12::rand(&mut OsRng); | ||
let b = Fp12::rand(&mut OsRng); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They'd prefer nondeterministic unit tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, they want fuzz/property tests. This is correct IMO.
This request addresses a few key concerns highlighted by the audit. These involve test coverage of edge cases in the higher level field extensions, an improved method for generating random elements in$\mathbb{G}_1$ and $\mathbb{G}_2$ , as well as clarifying miscallaneous typos, incorrect references in the comments, etc. Additionally, suggested improvements have been included. See the official response to the audit for more details.