Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PING suggest referencing the FIDO 100k batch requirements #749

Closed
agl opened this issue Jan 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

PING suggest referencing the FIDO 100k batch requirements #749

agl opened this issue Jan 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
@agl
Labels
privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. type:editorial
Milestone
Last Working Draft

Comments

@agl
Copy link
Contributor

agl commented Jan 17, 2018

During the PING conference call of 2018-01-11, PING suggested that we reference the FIDO batch requirements.
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

s/batch requirements/privacy principles/ ? if so then is this a duplicate of issue #742 ?

@agl
Copy link
Contributor Author

agl commented Jan 17, 2018

We can obviously decide whether we actually want to do this, but the request that I noted down from the phone call was to reference the batch requirements for attestation certificates specifically. The FIDO Privacy Principles document doesn't seem to contain that.

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added this to the CR milestone Jan 17, 2018
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. type:editorial labels Jan 17, 2018
@nadalin
Copy link
Contributor

nadalin commented Jan 18, 2018

@agl I think there is no harm as long as this is guidance, and this is not a duplicate of #472 so I think we should just do this

@selfissued
Copy link
Contributor

@agl where do you want this reference to be and what do you want it to say? I'll create a PR to add it if I know what to write.

agl added a commit to agl/webauthn that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2018
@agl
Reference the FIDO 100k batch sizes.
719f33b 
PING suggested referencing the FIDO 100k requirement as guideance on
suitable batch sizing for attestation certificates.

Fixes w3c#749
@agl agl mentioned this issue Jan 26, 2018
Merged
@agl agl closed this as completed in #767 Jan 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@agl agl

Labels
privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. type:editorial
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Last Working Draft
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@agl @equalsJeffH @selfissued @nadalin